Monday, June 22, 2015

Husband and Wife must file affidavits detailing income, assets, and expenditures during divorce proceedings

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 14th % January, 2015 FAO 369/1996


KUSUM SHARMA ..... Appellant
Through : Mr. Rajiv Saxena, Advocate Mr. Sunil Mittal, Amicus curiae

versus

MAHINDER KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent
Through : None.

WITH

FAO 297/1997, MAT.APP. 47/2005, MAT.APP. 64/2007, MAT.APP. 33/2010, MAT.APP. 35/2010, MAT.APP. 124/2010 MAT.APP. 36/2012 & MAT.APP. 8/2013

Present: Ms. Vandana Khurana, Advocate for the appellant in FAO 297/1997 Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocate for the appellant in MAT 47/2005 Ms. Anu Narula, Amicus Curiae in MAT APP. 47/2005 Ms. Anu Narula and Mr. Kunal Aurora, Advocates for the appellant in MAT APP. 64/2005 Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sood, Advocate for the appellant in MAT. APP 33/2010 Mr. Rajiv Bakshi, Advocate for the appellant in MAT. APP 35/2010 Mr. Hasan Kumar with Mr. Osama Suhail & Mr. Samama Suhail, Advocates for the appellant in MAT. APP 124/2010 Dr. L.S. Chaudhary, Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Ms. Pratibha & Ms. Ritu, Advocates for the appellant in MAT. APP 36/2012 FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Mr. Suraj Bhan, Advocate for the appellant in MAT. APP.8/2013 Mr. Sube Singh, Advocate for the respondent in MAT 47/2005 Mr. Deepak Khadaria, Advocate for the respondent in MAT. APP 33/2010 Shri Bhola Ram, respondent in person in MAT. APP.124/2010 Ms. Chandrika Gupta & Mr. Kartikeya Bhargava for Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate for the respondent in MAT. APP 36/2012 Mr. A.S. Sharma proxy for Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondent in MAT. APP.8/2013

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

JUDGMENT

1. The requirements of justice give an occasion for the development of new dimension of justice by evolving juristic principles for doing complete justice according to the current needs of the Society. The quest for justice in the process of administration of justice occasions the evolution of new dimensions of the justice. J.S. Verma, J., in his Article “New Dimensions of Justice”, (1997) 3 SCC J-3 observed that:-
 “...Justice is the ideal to be achieved by Law. Justice is the goal of law. Law is a set of general rules applied in the administration of justice. Justice is in a cause on application of law to a particular case. Jurisprudence is the philosophy of law. Jurisprudence and Law have ultimately to be tested FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters on the anvil of administration of justice. ‘Law as it is’, may fall short of 'Law as it ought to be' for doing complete justice in a cause. The gap between the two may be described as the field covered by Morality. There is no doubt that the development of the law is influenced by morals. The infusion of morality for reshaping the law is influenced by the principles of Equity and Natural Justice, as effective agencies of growth. The ideal State is when the rules of law satisfy the requirements of justice and the gap between the two is bridged. It is this attempt to bridge the gap which occasions the development of New Jurisprudence. The existence of some gap between law and justice is recognized by the existing law itself. This is the reason for the recognition of inherent powers of the court by express provision made in the Code of Civil Procedure and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Constitution of India by Article 142 expressly confers on the Supreme Court plenary powers for doing complete justice in any cause or matter before it. Such power in the court of last resort is recognition of the principle that in the justice delivery system, at the end point attempt must be made to do complete justice in every cause, if that result cannot be achieved by provisions of the enacted law. These powers are in addition to the discretionary powers of courts in certain areas where rigidity is considered inappropriate, e.g., equitable reliefs and Article 226 of the Constitution. ...”

2. Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act empowers the Court to award maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses to a Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 4 of 46 party who has no independent income sufficient for his/her support in proceedings pending under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, having regard to the income of the parties. The Proviso to Section 24 provides that application under Section 24 shall be disposed of within 60 days of the date of service of notice on the opposite party.

3. Maintenance is not merely a legal right. It is part and parcel of basic human right. For weaker sections, it is a problem in the sense that their very survival rest on the maintenance. The object behind the provision is two-fold: firstly, to prevent vagrancy resulting from stained relation between the husband and wife, and secondly, to ensure that the indigent litigating spouse is not handicapped in defending or prosecuting the case due to want of money. On the breakdown of the marriage, it often so happens that the husband pays nothing for the support of his wife and children and the wife has to fall back upon her parents and relatives to fend her immediate needs. Reasonableness too demands extension of such a relief in favour of a needy spouse. Had not the parties drifted away from one another, the spouse from whom support is sought would have in any case supported the other spouse entailing financial burden. Hence, it is but natural to make the husband bear the cost of maintaining his wife pending disposal of any dispute until some permanent relief is provided to her.

4. In Bhuwan Mohan Singh v. Meena & Ors, AIR 2014 SC 2875 the Supreme Court held that any delay in adjudication of maintenance cases by the Family Court is not only against human FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 5 of 46 rights but also against the basic embodiment of dignity of an individual. The object of the provisions for grant of maintenance is to provide speedy remedy for supply of food, clothing and shelter to the deserted wife and to prevent vagrancy and destitution. “2. The two issues that pronouncedly emanate in this appeal by special leave are whether the Family Court while deciding an application under Section 7 of the Family Court Act, 1984 (for brevity, “the Act”) which includes determination of grant of maintenance to the persons as entitled under that provision, should allow adjournments in an extremely liberal manner remaining oblivious of objects and reasons of the Act and also keeping the windows of wisdom closed and the sense of judicial responsiveness suspended to the manifest perceptibility of vagrancy, destitution, impecuniosity, struggle for survival and the emotional fracture, a wife likely to face under these circumstances and further exhibiting absolute insensitivity to her condition, who, after loosing support of the husband who has failed to husband the marital status denies the wife to have maintenance for almost nine years as that much time is consumed to decide the lis and, in addition, to restrict the grant of maintenance to the date of order on some kind of individual notion. Both the approaches, as we perceive, not only defeat the command of the legislature but also frustrate the hope of wife and children who are deprived of adequate livelihood and whose aspirations perish like mushroom and possibly the brief candle of sustenance joins the marathon race of extinction. The observations of the Supreme Court are as under: This delay in adjudication by the Family Court is FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 6 of 46 not only against human rights but also against the basic embodiment of dignity of an individual. 3. Be it ingeminated that Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “the Code”) was conceived to ameliorate the agony, anguish, financial suffering of a woman who left her matrimonial home for the reasons provided in the provision so that some suitable arrangements can be made by the Court and she can sustain herself and also her children if they are with her. The concept of sustenance does not necessarily mean to lead the life of an animal, feel like an unperson to be thrown away from grace and roam for her basic maintenance somewhere else. She is entitled in law to lead a life in the similar manner as she would have lived in the house of her husband. That is where the status and strata come into play, and that is where the obligations of the husband, in case of a wife, become a prominent one. In a proceeding of this nature, the husband cannot take subterfuges to deprive her of the benefit of living with dignity. Regard being had to the solemn pledge at the time of marriage and also in consonance with the statutory law that governs the field, it is the obligation of the husband to see that the wife does not become a destitute, a beggar. A situation is not to be maladroitly created whereunder she is compelled to resign to her fate and think of life “dust unto dust”. It is totally impermissible. In fact, it is the sacrosanct duty to render the financial support even if the husband is required to earn money with physical labour, if he is able bodied. There is no escape route unless there is an order from the Court that the wife FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 7 of 46 is not entitled to get maintenance from the husband on any legally permissible grounds. xxx xxx xxx 9. A three-Judge Bench in Vimla (K.) v. Veeraswamy (K.)[2], while discussing about the basic purpose under Section 125 of the Code, opined that xxx xxx xxx Section 125 of the Code is meant to achieve a social purpose. The object is to prevent vagrancy and destitution. It provides a speedy remedy for the supply of food, clothing and shelter to the deserted wife. …It has come to the notice of the Court that on certain occasions the Family Courts have been granting adjournments in a routine manner as a consequence of which both the parties suffer or, on certain occasions, the wife becomes the worst victim. When such a situation occurs, the purpose of the law gets totally atrophied. The Family Judge is expected to be sensitive to the issues, for he is dealing with extremely delicate and sensitive issues pertaining to the marriage and issues ancillary thereto. When we say this, we do not mean that the Family Courts should show undue haste or impatience, but there is a distinction between impatience and to be wisely anxious and conscious about dealing with a situation. A Family Court Judge should remember that the procrastination is the greatest assassin of the lis before it. It not only gives rise to more family problems but also gradually builds unthinkable and Everestine bitterness. It leads to the cold refrigeration of the hidden feelings, if still left. The delineation of the lis by the Family Judge must FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 8 of 46 reveal the awareness and balance. Dilatory tactics by any of the parties has to be sternly dealt with, for the Family Court Judge has to be alive to the fact that the lis before him pertains to emotional fragmentation and delay can feed it to grow. We hope and trust that the Family Court Judges shall remain alert to this and decide the matters as expeditiously as possible keeping in view the objects and reasons of the Act and the scheme of various provisions pertaining to grant of maintenance, divorce, custody of child, property disputes, etc. (Emphasis supplied) ”

5. The basis of the claim for maintenance is that the claimant has no independent income to support herself and the Court has to take into consideration the income of both the parties. It is common knowledge that in maintenance cases parties rarely disclose their true income. The applicant is not generally aware of or is not in possession of documents from which the income of respondent can be ascertained. Such documents are accessible to the respondent only. Basis for the claim of maintenance

6. In Radhika v. Vineet Rungta, 110 (2004) DLT 111, this Court observed that parties rarely disclose their true income and therefore, the Court have to resort to the status and life style of the parties for fixing the maintenance. This Court held as under: “3. Cases where the parties disclose their actual income are extremely rare. Experience, therefore, dictates that where a decision has to be taken pertaining to the claim for maintenance, and the FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 9 of 46 quantum to be granted, the safer and surer method to be employed for coming to a realistic conclusion is to look at the status of the parties, since whilst incomes can be concealed, the status is palpably evident to all concerned. If any opulent lifestyle is enjoyed by warring spouses he should not be heard to complaint or plead that he has only a meagre income. (Emphasis supplied) If this approach had been followed, it would have been evident that the warring spouses enjoy a affluent lifestyle. It has already been noted that the learned Trial Court has not discussed the Husband's income. While granting maintenance it is incumbent on the Court to make such monetary arrangements as would be conducive to the spouses continuing a lifestyle to which they were accustomed before the matrimonial discord.”

7. Burden of proving the income
7.1 The true income of the parties is within their personal knowledge and therefore, the onus to prove their true income is on them under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act.
7.2 Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act reads as under: “Section 106 When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him.” - Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge – 7.3 The monthly income of the husband may not very often be within the knowledge of the wife, particularly in a case where the relationship is considerably strained and the spouses are living apart for a considerable period. Section 106 of the Indian Evidence FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Act specifically casts the burden of proof of the income on the husband since the relevant facts relating to his income cannot be within the specific knowledge of the wife. 7.4 It is noticed that upon the failure of the husband to disclose his true income without good reasons, the Courts normally draw a presumption against him and accept the allegations of the wife as to the income of the husband. However, this Court has some reservation about accepting the preposition that whatever estranged wife states with or without rational basis should be accepted as gospel truth. One cannot be oblivious to the human feeling of an estranged wife to exaggerate income of her estranged husband to extract as much as possible due to every increasing lack of sense of security. Every Court is supposed to be circumspect to ensure that unconsciously by any such order the Court is not forcing one or the other party to the extremes. This Court is of the view that the parties should be directed to file a detailed affidavit of their assets, income and expenditure and the supporting documents in order to determine their true income. 7.5 This Court is of the view that the assets, liabilities, income and expenditure of the parties are necessary to be determined not only to fix the maintenance under Section 24 but also to determine the permanent alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act and right to the joint properties under Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act. It is therefore necessary to formulate a format of the affidavit of assets, income and expenditure and also specify the documents to be disclosed by them. The format of the affidavit of FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters assets, income and expenditure would help the Court in determining the true income, expenditure, assets and liabilities of the parties. 8. 8.1 The Family Courts Act adopts a less formal procedure. Although Section 10 of the Act makes the procedure laid down under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applicable to Family Court proceedings, it also lays down that the Family Court is free to evolve its own rules of procedure. Section 10 of Family Courts Act, 1984 8.2 Section 10(3) of the Family Courts Act specifically uses the word ‘truth’ and casts a duty on the Family Court to lay down procedure to determine the truth of the facts alleged by one party and denied by the other. Section 10 of the Family Courts Act is reproduced hereunder: “Section 10 - (1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act and the rules, the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) and of any other law for the time being in force shall apply to the suits and proceedings other than proceedings under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)], before a Family Court and for the purposes of the said provisions of the Code, a Family Court shall be deemed to be a Civil Court and shall have all the powers of such Court. Procedure generally (2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act and the rules, the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (2 of 1974), or the rules made thereunder, shall apply to the proceedings under Chapter IX of that Code before a Family Court. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 12 of 46 (3) Nothing in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall prevent a Family Court from laying down its own procedure with a view to arrive at a settlement in respect of the subject-matter of the suit or proceedings or at the truth 9. of the facts alleged by the one party and denied by the other.” Truth should be the Guiding Star in the Entire Judicial Process 9.1 It is the duty of the Court to ascertain the true income of the parties and then pass the appropriate order relating to maintenance. Truth is the foundation of justice. Dispensation of justice, based on truth, is an essential feature in the justice delivery system. People would have faith in Courts when truth alone triumphs. The justice based on truth would establish peace in the society. 9.2 Krishna Iyer J. in Jasraj Inder Singh v. Hemraj Multanchand, (1977) 2 SCC 155 described truth and justice as under: “8. …Truth, like song, is whole, and half-truth can be noise! Justice is truth, is beauty and the strategy of healing injustice is discovery of the whole truth and harmonising human relations. Law's finest hour is not in meditating on abstractions but in being the delivery agent of full fairness. This divagation is justified by the need to remind ourselves that the grammar of justice according to law is not little litigative solution of isolated problems but resolving the conflict in its wider bearings.” (Emphasis supplied) 9.3 In Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India, (1989) 3 SCC 38, the Supreme Court described justice and truth to mean the same. The observations of the Supreme Court are as under: FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 13 of 46 “30. …when one speaks of justice and truth, these words mean the same thing to all men whose judgment is uncommitted. “Truth passes within herself a penetrating force unknown alike to error and falsehood. I say truth and you must understand my meaning. For the beautiful words Truth and Justice need not be defined in order to be understood in their true sense. They bear within them a shining beauty and a heavenly light. I firmly believe in the triumph of truth and justice. That is what upholds me in times of trial....” Of Truth and Justice, Anatole France said : (Emphasis supplied) 9.4 In 9.5 In Chandra Shashi v. Anil Kumar Verma, (1995) 1 SCC 421, the Supreme Court observed that to enable the Courts to ward off unjustified interference in their working, those who indulge in immoral acts like perjury, pre-variation and motivated falsehoods have to be appropriately dealt with, without which it would not be possible for any Court to administer justice in the true sense and to the satisfaction of those who approach it in the hope that truth would ultimately prevail. People would have faith in Courts when they would find that truth alone triumphs in Courts. Mohanlal Shamji Soni v. Union of India, 1991 Supp (1) SCC 271, the Supreme Court observed that the presiding officer of a Court should not simply sit as a mere umpire at a contest between two parties and declare at the end of the combat who has won and who has lost and that there is a legal duty of his own, independent of the parties, to take an active role in the proceedings in finding the truth and administering justice. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 14 of 46 9.6 In Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat, (2006) 3 SCC 374, the Supreme Court observed that right from the inception of the judicial system it has been accepted that discovery, vindication and establishment of truth are the main purposes underlying existence of Courts of justice. 9.7 In Himanshu Singh Sabharwal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (2008) 3 SCC 602, the Supreme Court held that the trial should be a search for the truth and not about over technicalities. The Supreme Court’s observation are as under: “5. … 31. In 1846, in a judgment which Lord Chancellor Selborne would later describe as ‘one of the ablest judgments of one of the ablest judges who ever sat in this Court’, Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce said [Pearse v. Pearse, (1846) 1 De G&Sm. 12 : 16 LJ Ch 153 : 63 ER 950 : 18 Digest (Repl.) 91, 748] : (De G&Sm. pp. 28-29): “31. The discovery and vindication and establishment of truth are main purposes certainly of the existence of courts of justice; still, for the obtaining of these objects, which, however valuable and important, cannot be usefully pursued without moderation, cannot be either usefully or creditably pursued unfairly or gained by unfair means, not every channel is or ought to be open to them. The practical inefficacy of torture is not, I suppose, the most weighty objection to that mode of examination,... Truth, like all other good things, may be loved unwisely—may be pursued too keenly—may cost too much. xxx xxx xxx 35. Courts have always been considered to have an overriding duty to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice—often referred to as the duty to vindicate and uphold the ‘majesty of the law’. (Emphasis Supplied) FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 15 of 46 9.8 In Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes v. Erasmo Jack de Sequeria, (2012) 5 SCC 370, the Supreme Court again highlighted the significance of truth and observed that the truth should be the guiding star in the entire legal process and it is the duty of the Judge to discover truth to do complete justice. The Supreme Court stressed that Judge has to play an active role to discover the truth and he should explore all avenues open to him in order to discover the truth. The Supreme Court observed as under: “32. In this unfortunate litigation, the Court's serious endeavour has to be to find out where in fact the truth lies. 33. The truth should be the guiding star in the entire judicial process.Truth alone has to be the foundation of justice. The entire judicial system has been created only to discern and find out the real truth. Judges at all levels have to seriously engage themselves in the journey of discovering the truth. That is their mandate, obligation and bounden duty. Justice system will acquire credibility xxx xxx xxx only when people will be convinced that justice is based on the foundation of the truth. 35. What people expect is that the Court should discharge its obligation to find out where in fact the truth lies. Right from inception of the judicial system it has been accepted that discovery, vindication and establishment of truth are the main purposes underlying the existence of the courts of justice. xxx xxx xxx 52. Truth is the foundation of justice. It must be the endeavour of all the judicial officers and judges to ascertain truth in every matter and no stone should be FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 16 of 46 left unturned in achieving this object. Courts must give greater emphasis on the veracity of pleadings and documents in order to ascertain the truth.” (Emphasis supplied) 10. 10.1 In Dalip Singh v. False claims and defences “1. For many centuries, Indian society cherished two basic values of life i.e., 'Satya' (truth) and 'Ahimsa' (nonviolence). Mahavir, Gautam Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi guided the people to ingrain these values in their daily life. Truth constituted an integral part of the justicedelivery system which was in vogue in the preIndependence era and the people used to feel proud to tell truth in the courts irrespective of the consequences. However, post-Independence period has seen drastic changes in our value system. The materialism has over shadowed the old ethos and the quest for personal gain has become so intense that those involved in litigation do not hesitate to take shelter of falsehood, misrepresentation and suppression of facts in the court proceedings. State of U.P., (2010) 2 SCC 114, the Supreme Court observed that a new creed of litigants have cropped up in the last 40 years who do not have any respect for truth and shamelessly resort to falsehood and unethical means for achieving their goals. The observations of the Supreme Court are as under:- 2. In last 40 years, a new creed of litigants has cropped up. Those who belong to this creed do not have any respect for truth. They shamelessly resort to falsehood and unethical means for achieving their goals. In order to meet the challenge posed by this new creed of litigants, the courts have, from time to time, evolved new rules and it is now well established that a litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final.” FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 17 of 46 (Emphasis supplied) 10.2 In Satyender Singh v. Gulab Singh, 2012 (129) DRJ 128, the Division Bench of this Court following Dalip Singh v. State of U.P. (supra) observed that the Courts are flooded with litigation with false and incoherent pleas and tainted evidence led by the parties due to which the judicial system in the country is choked and such litigants are consuming Court’s time for a wrong cause. The observations of this Court are as under:- “2. As rightly observed by the Supreme Court, Satya is a basic value of life which was required to be followed by everybody and is recognized since many centuries. In spite of caution, courts are continued to be flooded with litigation with false and incoherent pleas and tainted evidence led by the parties. The judicial system in the country is choked and such litigants are consuming courts‘ time for a wrong cause. Efforts are made by the parties to steal a march over their rivals by resorting to false and incoherent statements made before the Court. Indeed, it is a nightmare faced by a Trier of Facts; required to stitch a garment, when confronted with a fabric where the weft, shuttling back and forth across (Emphasis supplied) the warp in weaving, is nothing but lies. As the threads of the weft fall, the yarn of the warp also collapses; and there is no fabric left.” 11. 11.1 In Ramrameshwari Devi v. Nirmala Devi, (2011) 8 SCC 249, the Supreme Court has held that the Courts have to take into consideration pragmatic realities and have to be realistic in imposing the costs. The relevant paragraphs of the said judgment are reproduced hereunder:- Imposition of costs FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 18 of 46 “43. ...We are clearly of the view that unless we ensure that wrongdoers are denied profit or undue benefit from the frivolous litigation, it would be difficult to control frivolous and uncalled for litigations. In order to curb uncalled for and frivolous litigation, the courts have to ensure that there is no incentive or motive for uncalled for litigation. It is a matter of common experience that court's otherwise scarce and valuable time is consumed or more appropriately wasted in a large number of uncalled for cases. xxx xxx xxx 52. The main question which arises for our consideration is whether the prevailing delay in civil litigation can be curbed? In our considered opinion the existing system can be drastically changed or improved if the following steps are taken by the trial courts while dealing with the civil trials. xxx xxx xxx C. Imposition of actual, realistic or proper costs and or ordering prosecution would go a long way in controlling the tendency of introducing false pleadings and forged and fabricated documents by the litigants. Imposition of heavy costs would also control unnecessary adjournments by the parties. In appropriate cases the courts may consider ordering prosecution otherwise it may not be possible to maintain purity and sanctity of judicial proceedings… xxx xxx xxx 54. While imposing costs we have to take into consideration pragmatic realities and be realistic what the Defendants or the Respondents had to actually incur in contesting the litigation before different courts. We have to also broadly take into consideration the prevalent fee structure of the lawyers and other miscellaneous expenses which have to be incurred towards drafting and filing of the counter affidavit, miscellaneous charges towards typing, photocopying, court fee etc. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 19 of 46 55. The other factor which should not be forgotten while imposing costs is for how long the Defendants or Respondents were compelled to contest and defend the litigation in various courts. The Appellants in the instant case have harassed the Respondents to the hilt for four decades in a totally frivolous and dishonest litigation in various courts. The Appellants have also wasted judicial time of the various courts for the last 40 years. 56. On consideration of totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, we do not find any infirmity in the well reasoned impugned order/judgment. These appeals are consequently dismissed with costs, which we quantify as Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only). We are imposing the costs not out of anguish but by following the fundamental principle that wrongdoers should not get benefit out of frivolous litigation….” (Emphasis supplied) 11.2 “82. This Court in a recent judgment in Ramrameshwari Devi and Ors. (supra) aptly observed at page 266, para 43 that unless wrongdoers are denied profit from frivolous litigation, it would be difficult to prevent it. In order to curb uncalled for and frivolous litigation, the Courts have to ensure that there is no incentive or motive for uncalled for litigation. It is a matter of common experience that Court's otherwise scarce time is consumed or more appropriately, wasted in a large number of uncalled for cases. In this very judgment, the Court provided that this problem can be solved or at least be minimized if exemplary cost is imposed for instituting frivolous litigation. The Court observed at pages 267-268 that imposition of actual, realistic or proper costs and/or ordering prosecution in appropriate cases would go a In Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes v. Erasmo Jack de Sequeria (supra) the Supreme Court held that heavy costs and prosecution should be ordered in cases of false claims and defences. The Supreme Court held as under:- FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 20 of 46 long way in controlling the tendency of introducing false pleadings and forged and fabricated documents by the litigants. Imposition of heavy costs would also control unnecessary adjournments by the parties. In appropriate cases, the Courts may consider ordering prosecution otherwise it may not be possible to maintain purity and sanctity of judicial proceedings.” 12. 12.1 Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 invests the Judge with plenary powers to put any question to any witness or party; in any form, at any time, about any fact relevant or irrelevant. Section 165 is intended to arm the Judge with the most extensive power possible for the purpose of getting at the truth. The effect of this section is that in order to get to the bottom of the matter before it, the Court will be able to look at and inquire into every fact and thus possibly acquire valuable indicative evidence which may lead to other evidence strictly relevant and admissible. The Court is not, however, permitted to found its judgment on any but relevant statements. Judge’s Power to put questions or order production 12.2 Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 reads as under: “Section 165. Judge’s power to put questions or order production.- The Judge may, in order to discover or obtain proper proof of relevant facts, ask any question he pleases, in any form, at any time, of any witness, or of the parties, about any fact relevant or irrelevant; and may order the production of any document or thing; and neither the parties nor their agents shall be entitled to make any objection to any such question or order, nor, without the FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 21 of 46 leave of the Court, to cross-examine any witness upon any answer given in reply to any such question: Provided that the judgment must be based upon facts declared by this Act to be relevant, and duly proved: Provided also that this section shall not authorize any Judge to compel any witness to answer any question or to produce any document which such witness would be entitled to refuse to answer or produce under Sections 121 to 131, both inclusive, if the question were asked or the document were called for by the adverse party; nor shall the Judge ask any question which it would be improper for any other person to ask under Section 148 or 149 ; nor shall he dispense with primary evidence of any document, except in the cases herein before excepted.” 12.3 The object of a trial is, first to ascertain truth by the light of reason, and then, do justice upon the basis of the truth and the Judge is not only justified but required to elicit a fact, wherever the interest of truth and justice would suffer, if he did not. 12.4 The Judge contemplated by Section 165 is not a mere umpire at a wit-combat between the lawyers for the parties whose only duty is to enforce the rules of the game and declare at the end of the combat who has won and who has lost. He is expected, and indeed it is his duty, to explore all avenues open to him in order to discover the truth and to that end, question witnesses on points which the lawyers for the parties have either overlooked or left obscure or willfully avoided. A Judge, who at the trial merely sits and records evidence without caring so to conduct the examination of the witnesses that every point is brought out, is not fulfilling his duty. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 22 of 46 12.5 The Supreme Court in Ram Chander v. State of Haryana, (1981) 3 SCC 191 observed that under Section 165, the Court has ample power and discretion to control the trial effectively. While conducting trial, the Court is not required to sit as a silent spectator or umpire but to take active part within the boundaries of law by putting questions to witnesses in order to elicit the truth and to protect the weak and the innocent. It is the duty of a Judge to discover the truth and for that purpose he may "ask any question, in any form, at any time, of any witness, or of the parties, about any fact, relevant or irrelevant". 12.6 In Ritesh Tewari v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2010) 10 SCC 677, the Supreme Court held that every trial is a voyage of discovery in which truth is the quest. The power under Section 165 is to be exercised with the object of subserving the cause of justice and public interest, and for getting the evidence in aid of a just decision and to uphold the truth. It is an extraordinary power conferred upon the Court to elicit the truth and to act in the interest of justice. The purpose being to secure justice by full discovery of truth and an accurate knowledge of facts, the Court can put questions to the parties, except those which fall within exceptions contained in the said provision itself. 12.7 In State of Rajasthan v. Ani, (1997) 6 SCC162, the Supreme Court held that Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act confers vast and unrestricted powers on the Court to elicit truth. Reticence may be good in many circumstances, but a Judge remaining mute during trial is not an ideal situation. A taciturn FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 23 of 46 Judge may be the model caricatured in public mind. But there is nothing wrong in his becoming active or dynamic during trial so that criminal justice being the end could be achieved. A Judge is expected to actively participate in the trial to elicit necessary materials from witnesses in the appropriate context which he feels necessary for reaching the correct conclusion. 13. Vide order dated 18 Suggestions th September, 2014, this Court had suggested that all petitions under Sections 9 to 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act to be accompanied with an affidavit of assets, income and expenditure of the petitioner in terms of Puneet Kaur v. Inderjeet Sawhney (supra) and the respondent should file his/her affidavit of assets, income and expenditure within 30 days of the service of the notice along with the response of the petitioner’s affidavit (paras 33.3 and 33.5 of the order dated 18th 14. Vide order dated 18 September, 2014). th 14.1 Mr. Sunil Mittal, learned amicus curiae made following suggestions at the time of hearing: September, 2014, this Court further directed the Courts below to give their suggestions with respect to the working of the guidelines in pursuance to which the Family Courts and the Courts dealing with the cases of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. have sent their response as well as their suggestions. The learned amicus curiae and the other Advocates have also given their suggestions which are discussed hereunder: FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 24 of 46 (i) The parties should disclose their assets, income and expenditure at the time of the marriage or one year before the date of separation whichever is later; secondly at the time of separation and thirdly, at the time of deposing the affidavit. (ii) The parties are well aware of the assets, income and expenditure of the other spouse and therefore, the parties should give the particulars of the assets, income and expenditure of the other spouse in their affidavit itself. (iii) The list of documents to be filed along with affidavit be specified to enable the litigants to file the relevant documents available with them. (iv) The appearance of the parties on each and every date of hearing in matrimonial cases be made mandatory. 14.2 Ms. Anu Narula, learned amicus curiae, submitted that the format of the affidavit prescribed in Puneet Kaur’s case is quite comprehensive. Ms. Anu Narula however has suggested that the employees of the MNCs normally have two separate contracts, one pertaining to the salary and the other pertaining to the incentives/commissions, which they do not normally disclose to the Court. The employee of the Companies should disclose the Cost to Company Certificate which would give the real income of the person as it would include the commissions, incentives, hefty annual bonuses. It is further submitted that the report of the CIBIL provides a complete insight into the person’s liabilities qua loans and repayments and it gives a clear indication of the financial position of a person. Ms. Anu Narula suggested the following documents to be filed along with the affidavit :- (i) Income Tax returns. (ii) Form 16 and Form 12BA FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 25 of 46 (iii) Appointment letter (iv) Cost to Company Certificate (v) Report of CIBIL (Credit Information Bureau India Limited). 14.3 Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, learned Senior Advocate appointed as amicus curiae vide order dated 23rd 14.4 Mr. Hasan Anzar and Ms. Samana Suhail, Advocates, have given the following suggestions: December, 2011 has given the list of documents to be submitted along with the affidavit of assets and income. (i) The aforesaid procedure should also be followed in cases relating to Special Marriage Act and Indian Divorce Act. (ii) The copies of the affidavits and the pleadings should be exchanged by the counsels by e-mail. (iii) Corpus should be created for the minor children and unmarried daughter. (iv) The maintenance should be enhanced @ 4% to 6% per annum. (v) The cause list of the Family Court should be put on the website. (vi) The following documents should be filed along with the affidavit: (a) Income Tax Return/Form 16 for the last three years. (b) Salary certificate/Cost to Company Certificate for the last three years. (c) Bank statement of all the bank accounts for the last three years. (d) Credit/Debit card statements. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 26 of 46 (e) Income of joint family business should be taken into consideration. (f) Documents relating to the investment in real estate properties including pre-launch and launched projects. (g) Insurance policies/mutual fund and other investments in valuable securities. (h) Agricultural income. 14.5 Dr. L.S. Chaudhary, Advocate made the following suggestions: (i) The order dated 18th (ii) In cases a petition for divorce by the wife who is claiming maintenance under Section 24 from the husband, the wife should not be required to pay litigation expenses to the respondent. September 2014 be modified but reviewed after a period of six months. 14.6 Mr. Ashwini Sood, Advocate submitted that the disposal of the maintenance application by the Family Courts are delayed because of huge pendency of cases. It is further submitted that the party filing false affidavit of assets, income and expenditure should be immediately prosecuted under Section 340 Cr.P.C. 14.7 The Family Courts and the Courts dealing with cases under Section 125 Cr.P.C. have also sent their suggestions which are as under: (i) The affidavit should require the party to state whether similar monetary relief has been claimed in any other proceedings and if so, the particulars of the monetary relief awarded be given. (ii) Earning spouse should append income certificate from his employer. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 27 of 46 (iii) Direction to filing section not to accept incomplete petitions. (iv) Following additional information be sought in the affidavit of assets, income and expenditure: (a) Admitted amount of maintenance which the spouse is prepared to pay to the other spouse. (b) Name and relationship of the person with whom he/she is residing along with the affidavit of income of such relations. (c) The income tax returns and salary slips for the last three years, PAN card, passport, aadhar, voter ID card and insurance policy of the vehicle be also called for from the parties. (d) Interim order with respect to payment of school fees of the children should be made on the very first date. (v) All cases between the parties should be taken up by one Court. (vi) Not more than 500-700 cases should be allocated to each Court to enable them to expedite the hearing in terms of Section 4 of the Family Courts Act. (vii) DLSA should assign one legal aid counsel to each Family Court to assist litigants. (viii) Rs.11,000/- should be directed to be paid towards interim litigation expenses. (ix) The report of the SDM should be sought to verify the financial status of the parties. (x) Establishment of Family Courts Settlement Fund by Govt. of NCT of Delhi to provide immediate interim relief releasing maintenance in deserving cases. (xi) Courts be authorized to appoint an amicus curiae in appropriate cases. (xii) Sensitize lawyers with regard to the directions issued by this Court. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 28 of 46 (xiii) Connectivity with the server should be provided to the Family Courts. 15. 15.1 Order 21 Rule 41(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers the Court, in execution of a money decree, to examine the judgment debtor to ascertain the properties owned by him. Order 21 Rule 41(2) further empowers the Court to direct the judgment debtor to file an affidavit stating the particulars of the assets of the judgment debtor. Upon disobedience of such an order, Order 21 Rule 41(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers the Court to send the judgment debtor to civil prison for a term not exceeding three months. Affidavit of income and assets provided in Form 16A of APPENDIX-E under Order 21 Rule 41(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure 15.2 The form of the affidavit required to be filed by the judgment debtor under Order 21 Rule 41(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure is provided in Form 16-A in Appendix E. 15.3 Initially the Matrimonial Courts were directing the parties to file the affidavit in the format given in Form 16-A of Appendix E under Order 21 Rule 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure but the litigants were not truly disclosing their income in the said affidavit. 15.4 This Court is of the view that the format of affidavit of assets, income and expenditure provided in Form 16-A of Appendix E of the Code of Civil Procedure is not comprehensive to discover the complete income, assets and expenditure of the parties in matrimonial litigation and therefore, there is a need to formulate a comprehensive affidavit of assets, income and FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 29 of 46 expenditure. Puneet Kaur v. Inderjit Singh Sawhney, 2011 (183) DLT 403 16. In Puneet Kaur v. Inderjit Singh Sawhney (supra), this Court, while dealing with Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, directed both the parties to file detailed affidavits of their assets, income and expenditure. The relevant portion of the said judgment is held as under: 7. ...both the parties are directed to file their respective affidavits of assets, income and expenditure from the date of the marriage up to this date containing the following particulars:— 7.1 (i) Educational qualifications. Personal Information (ii) Professional qualifications. (iii) Present occupation. (iv) Particulars of past occupation, (v) Members of the family. (a) Dependent. (b) Independent. 7.2 (i) Salary, if in service. Income (ii) Income from business/profession, if self employed. (iii) Particulars of all earnings since marriage. (iv) Income from other sources:— (a) Rent. (b) Interest on bank deposits and FDRs. (c) Other interest i.e. on loan, deposits, NSC, IVP, KVP, Post Office schemes, PPF etc. (d) Dividends. (e) Income from machinery, plant or furniture let on hire. (f) Gifts and Donations. (g) Profit on sale of movable/immovable assets. (h) Any other income not covered above. 7.3 Assets FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 30 of 46 (i) Immovable properties:— (a) Building in the name of self and its Fair Market Value (FMV):— - Residential. - Commercial. - Mortgage. - Given on rent. - Others. (b) Plot/land. (c) Leasehold property. (d) Intangible property e.g. patents, trademark, design, goodwill. (e) Properties in the name of family members/HUF and their FMV. (ii) Movable properties:— (a) Furniture and fixtures. (b) Plant and Machinery. (c) Livestock. (d) Vehicles i.e. car, scooter along with their brand and registration number. (iii) Investments:— (a) Bank Accounts - Current or Savings. (b) Demat Accounts. (c) Cash. (d) FDRs, NSC, IVP, KVP, Post Office schemes, PPF etc. (e) Stocks, shares, debentures, bonds, units and mutual funds. (f) LIC policy. (g) Deposits with Government and Non-Government entities. (h) Loan given to friends, relatives and others. (i) Telephone, mobile phone and their numbers. (j) TV, Fridge, Air Conditioner, etc. (k) Other household appliances. (l) Computer, Laptop. (m) Other electronic gadgets including I-pad etc. (n) Gold, silver and diamond Jewellery. (o) Silver Utensils. (p) Capital in partnership firm, sole proprietorship firm. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 31 of 46 (q) Shares in the Company in which Director. (r) Undivided share in HUF property. (s) Booking of any plot, flat, membership in Co-op. Group Housing Society. (t) Other investments not covered by above items. (iv) Any other assets not covered above. 7.4 (i) OD, CC, Term Loan from bank and other institutions. Liabilities (ii) Personal/business loan (a) Secured. (b) Unsecured. (iii) Home loan. (iv) Income Tax, Wealth Tax and Property Tax. 7.5 (i) Rent and maintenance including electricity, water and gas. Expenditure (ii) Lease rental, if any asset taken on hire. (iii) Installment of any house loan, car loan, personal loan, business loan, etc. (iv) Interest to bank or others. (v) Education of children including tuition fee. (vi) Conveyance including fuel, repair and maintenance of vehicle. Also give the average distance travelled every day. (vii) Premium of LIC, Medi-claim, house and vehicle policy. (viii) Premium of ULIP, Mutual Fund. (ix) Contribution to PPF, EPF, approved superannuation fund. (x) Mobile/landline phone bills. (xi) Club subscription and usage, subscription to news papers, periodicals, magazines, etc. (xii) Internet charges/cable charges. (xiii) Household expenses including kitchen, clothing, etc. (xiv) Salary of servants, gardener, watchmen, etc. (xv) Medical/hospitalization expenses. (xvi) Legal/litigation expenses. (xvii) Expenditure on dependent family members. (xviii) Expenditure on entertainment. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 32 of 46 (xix) Expenditure on travel including outstation/foreign travel, business as well as personal. (xx) Expenditure on construction/renovation and furnishing of residence/office. (xxi) Any other expenditure not covered above. 7.6 (i) Status of family members. General Information regarding Standard of Living and Lifestyle (ii) Credit/debit cards. (iii) Expenditure on marriage including marriage of family members. (iv) Expenditure on family functions including birthday of the children. (v) Expenditure on festivals. (vi) Expenditure on extra-curricular activities. (vii) Destination of honeymoon. (viii) Frequency of travel including outstation/foreign travel, business as well as personal. (ix) Mode of travel in city/outside city. (x) Mode of outstation/foreign travel including type of class. (xi) Category of hotels used for stay, official as well as personal, including type of rooms. (xii) Category of hospitals opted for medical treatment including type of rooms. (xiii) Name of school(s) where the child or children are studying. (xiv) Brand of vehicle, mobile and wrist watch. (xv) Value of jewellery worn. (xvi) Details of residential accommodation. (xvii) Value of gifts received. (xviii) Value of gifts given at family functions. (xix) Value of donations given. (xx) Particulars of credit card/debit card, its limit and usage. (xxi) Average monthly withdrawal from bank. (xxii) Type of restaurant visited for dining out. (xxiii) Membership of clubs, societies and other associations. (xxiv) Brand of alcohol, if consumed. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 33 of 46 (xxv) Particulars of all pending as well as decided cases including civil, criminal, labour, income tax, excise, property tax, MACT, etc. with parties name. 8. (i) Relevant documents with respect to income including Salary certificate, Form 16A, Income Tax Returns, certificate from the employer regarding cost to the company, balance sheet, etc. Both the parties are also directed to file, along with affidavit, copies of the documents relating to their assets, income and expenditure from the date of the marriage up to this date and more particularly the following:— (ii) Audited accounts, if deponent is running business and otherwise, non-audited accounts i.e. balance sheets, profit and loss account and capital account. (iii) Statement of all bank accounts. (iv) Statement of Demat accounts. (v) Passport. (vi) Credit cards. (vii) Club membership cards. (viii) Frequent Flyer cards. (ix) PAN card. (x) Applications seeking job, in case of unemployed person. 9. 11. The affidavit and documents be filed within a period of four weeks with an advance copy to opposite parties who shall file their response within two weeks thereafter. 17. Both the parties are directed to remain present in Court on the next date of hearing along with all original documents relating to their assets, income and expenditure.” 17.1 This Court is of the view that a comprehensive affidavit of assets, income and expenditure should be filed by the both the parties at the very threshold in all matrimonial cases to enable the Courts to determine the maintenance on the basis of true income of Format of the affidavit of assets, income and expenditure. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 34 of 46 the parties. 17.2 The affidavit of assets, income and expenditure by the parties at the very threshold of matrimonial litigation has following advantages:- (i) The parties will have to disclose their true income, assets and expenditure. (ii) The maintenance order can be passed expeditiously without any delay on the basis of the affidavit. (iii) Substantial judicial time would be saved. (iv) The maintenance would be fixed by the Court on the basis of true income of the parties. 17.3 The learned amici curiae agree to the formulating of the format of the affidavit of income, assets and expenditure to be filed by the parties. 17.4 This Court has formulated the draft of the assets, income and expenditure to be filed by the parties at the very threshold in all matrimonial cases which is attached hereto as Annexure A. 18. 18.1 This Court has examined the matrimonial law in various countries namely U.S.A, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and South Africa where it is mandatory for both parties in the matrimonial litigation to file the affidavit of their assets, income, expenditure and liabilities at the very threshold of matrimonial litigation and the format of the affidavit is duly prescribed in the Rules. The Rules and mandatory formats of affidavit of assets, income and expenditure down loaded and examined by this Court are as under: International Best Practices FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 35 of 46 S.No Name of the Country Name of the Court Applicable Rules Affidavit for financial disclosure Hyper Link 1. U.S.A. Circuit Court of Nineteenth Judicial Circuit Lake County, Illinois PART 11.00 Family Law Financial Affidavit 11.02 1. http://19thcircuitcourt.state.il.us/crt_for ms/Documents/family/AffidavitFinancial11.02_040306.pdf 2. http://19thcircuitcourt.state.il.us/resour ces/Pages/rules11.aspx 2. U.S.A Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Division of Domestic Relations and Juvenile Branch Rules of Domestic Relations Division Affidavit of Income and Expenses 1.http://www.fccourts.org/DRJ/PDF/forms/ income_affidavit.pdf 2. http://www.franklincountyohio.gov/clerk /drfaq.cfm 3. U.S.A Family Court of the State of New York County. Part 205. Uniform rules for the family court Financial Disclosure Affidavit 1. https://www.nycourts.gov/forms/familyc ourt/pdfs/4-17.pdf 2. http://www.nycourts.gov/rules/trialcourts /205.shtml 4. U.S.A Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure Affidavit of Financial Information 1. https://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/ sscDocs/pdf/drosc13f.pdf 2. https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Browse /Home/Arizona/ArizonaCourtRules/Ariz onaStatutesCourtRules?guid=N258B8E4 0715611DAA16E8D4AC7636430&origi nationContext=documenttoc&transitionT ype=Default&contextData=(sc.Default) 5. U.S.A State of Winsconsin, Circuit Court Basic guide to Divorce/ Legal Seperation Financial Disclosure Statement 1. http://www.wicourts.gov/forms/fa- 4139.pdf 2. https://www.wicourts.gov/formdisplay/F A4100_instructions.pdf?formNumber=F A4100&formType=Instructions&formatI d=2&language=en 6. U.S.A Montgomery County Domestic Relations Court Rules of the Domestic Relations Division Affidavit Affidavit of Financial Disclosure 1. http://www.mcohio.org/government/dom estic_relations_court/docs/affidavit_of_fi nancial_disclosure.pdf 2.www.mcohio.org/government/domestic_ relations_court/docs/LOCAL_RULES.p df 7. U.K. Royal Court of Justice Rules of Application for financial remedy Form E Financial Statement 1. http://www.jordanpublishing.co.uk/syst em/redactor_assets/documents/709/For m_E.pdf 2. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/proc edure-rules/family/parts/part_09 8. Canada Queen’s Bench and the Court of Appeal Alberta Rules of Court Schedule A to Form FL – 17 , Statement of Income , Assets and Liabilities 1. http://www.albertacourts.ab.ca/LinkCli ck.aspx?fileticket=nE63Bp0FClQ%3D &tabid=310 9. Republic of South Africa Maintenance Act 99 of 1998 Application for Maintenance Order. 1. http://www.justice.gov.za/forms/mainten ance/MNT_Form%20A.pdf 2.www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/1998 -099.pdf 10. Australia Family Court of Australia Family Law Rules – Rule 13.05 Federal Circuit Court Rules- Rule 24.02 Financial Statement 1. http://www.familylawcourts.gov.au/wps/ wcm/resources/file/ebfc574063514ae/Fin ancialStatement_form_0313V1.pdf 2. http://www.familylawcourts.gov.au/wps/ wcm/connect/FLC/Home/Forms/Family +Law+Courts+forms/Financial_Stateme nt_form FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 36 of 46 18.2 The relevant Rules of Nineteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Lake County, Illinois, U.S.A. (http://19thcircuitcourt. state.il.us/ resources/Pages/rules11.aspx#top) are as under: - “11.02 AFFIDAVIT OF PARTIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS A. Prior to the Initial Case Management Conference. 1. Seven days prior to the initial case management conference in any proceeding for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the parties of record shall exchange with each other completed Comprehensive Financial Affidavits of income, expenses, assets and liabilities in the form approved by the court. 2. The Comprehensive Financial Affidavit shall not be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court. 3. On or before the initial case management conference, each party of record shall file with the Clerk of the Circuit Court a certificate of compliance certifying that the Comprehensive Financial Affidavit has been completed and setting forth the date the completed Comprehensive Financial Affidavit was served upon the opposing party.” (Emphasis Supplied) 18.3 The relevant rules of the Domestic Relations Division of Montgomery County Domestic Relations Court, U.S.A (http://www.mcohio.org/government/domestic_relations_court /docs/LOCAL_RULES.pdf ) are as under: - “RULE 4.10 AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE (A) Required Filing. The court’s approved Affidavit of Financial Disclosure[Appendix, Form 2] shall be timely submitted to the court as required by this rule, on the forms provided by the court or computer generated duplications. All Affidavits of Financial Disclosure shall FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 37 of 46 be complete and provide detailed disclosure under oath. Incomplete affidavits may not be accepted or considered by the court. Every party is under an affirmative duty to supplement any Affidavit of Financial Disclosure immediately upon any material change in employment, income, expenses or other information included in the affidavit. The Supreme Court of Ohio has authorized the use of their Affidavit of Income and Expenses (See Appendix Form 2A). If a party elects to use this form and the party is requesting a temporary custody or support order, the party must file a separate motion for the temporary order. (B) Distribution of Affidavit. (1) Divorce, Legal Separation, Annulment: All complaints for divorce, legal separation, or annulment shall be accompanied by an Affidavit of Financial Disclosure, a copy of which shall be sent by the plaintiff to the defendant. All defendants shall submit to the court an Affidavit of Financial Disclosure within fourteen (14) days of service of summons or with any Answer or Counterclaim if one has not already been submitted, and shall serve a copy on the plaintiff. (2) Dissolutions of Marriage: In petitions for dissolutions (3) Domestic Violence: In all domestic violence cases where support is an issue, the petitioner shall submit to the court an Affidavit of Financial Disclosure which shall be sent to the respondent. The respondent shall submit to the court and shall send to the petitioner an Affidavit of Financial Disclosure prior to the next hearing on the matter. of marriage, an Affidavit of Financial Disclosure shall be submitted to the court by each party contemporaneously with the petition. (4) Post Decree Motions: In all post decree motions where support is an issue, the moving party shall submit to the court an Affidavit of Financial Disclosure which shall be sent to the non-moving party. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 38 of 46 The non-moving party shall submit to the court and send to the moving party an Affidavit of Financial Disclosure within fourteen (14) days of service of summons, or three (3) days prior to the next hearing on the matter, whichever is earlier.” (Emphasis supplied) 18.4 The view taken by this Court in Puneet Kaur v. Inderjit Singh Sawhney (supra) with respect to the necessity of affidavit of assets, income and expenditure of the parties to determine the true income of the parties and the direction of this Court in the order dated 18th Conclusion September, 2014 for filing of the affidavit of assets, income and expenditure at the very threshold of matrimonial litigation in all matrimonial cases to do complete justice is in conformity with the international best practices in the developed countries. 19. On careful consideration of the valuable suggestions given by the Courts below, learned amici curiae and the counsels for the parties, the order dated 18th 19.1 Matrimonial jurisdiction is of a special nature and deserves a special attention. Lengthy trial in matrimonial proceedings is uncalled for and contrary to the spirit of Hindu Marriage Act. September, 2014 is modified and the modified directions are as under: - 19.2 The affidavit of assets, income and expenditure of both the parties are necessary to determine the rights of the parties under Sections 24 to 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act and, therefore, should be filed by both the parties at the very threshold in order to curb the FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 39 of 46 delay and expedite the trial in terms of Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. 19.3 Applying the aforesaid principles laid down in Section 10(3) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act relating to the duty of the Court to ascertain the truth and the duty of the parties to disclose their income under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, this Court has formulated the format of the affidavit of assets, income and expenditure attached to this order as Annexure ‘A’ which shall form part of this judgment. The documents required to be filed along with the affidavit are prescribed in the format of the affidavit. 19.4 All pleadings including petitions under Sections 9 to 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act and the written statement shall be accompanied with an affidavit of assets, income and expenditure in the format provided in Annexure A and shall be accompanied by the relevant documents mentioned therein. 19.5 If the petitioner claims maintenance, application under Section 24 should be filed along with the petition. However, if respondent claims maintenance, the application under Section 24 along with the affidavit of assets, income and expenditure in the format provided in Annexure A along with the response to the petitioner’s affidavit should be filed within 30 days of the service of the notice. 19.6 The response to the respondent’s affidavit of assets, income and expenditure be filed by the petitioner within two weeks FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 40 of 46 thereafter and the case be listed for disposal of the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. If the parties are unable to file their response within two weeks, Court may suitably extend the time period upon sufficient cause being shown. 19.7 The Court may also call upon the parties of to file such an affidavit in pending cases of maintenance if the parties have not already disclosed their true income. 19.8 Paras 33.3 and 33.5 of the order dated 18th 19.9 There may be cases where one of the spouse has sufficient means of sustenance and therefore, the application under Section 24 is not warranted at the initial stage. In such cases, the concerned spouse need not file the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act but shall specifically mention this fact in the pleadings i.e. petition/written statement, as the case may be. In such cases, the written statement along with the affidavit in the format provided in the Annexure A be filed by the respondent within 30 days of the service of summons. However, this would not preclude the filing of the application under Section 24 at a later stage, if the circumstances so warrant. September, 2014 are modified to the extent that the parties shall file the affidavit of their assets, income and expenditure in format provided in Annexure A, instead of the affidavit prescribed in Puneet Kaur v. Inderjeet Sawhney (supra). 19.10 Even in cases where Section 24 is not invoked by either of the parties, the affidavit of assets, income and expenditure in terms FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 41 of 46 of Annexure A shall be filed by both the parties for the purpose of adjudicating claims under Sections 25 to 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which may be raised at a later stage. If the affidavits of the parties are on record, the claim under Sections 25 to 27 would not delay the proceedings. 19.11 If the claim of permanent alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act is raised before the appellate Court, as in the present appeals, the appellate Court can direct the parties to file their affidavits of assets, income and expenditure in terms of Annexure A. However, if such affidavits of the parties are already on record, the adjudication of claim under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act would not delay the proceedings. 19.12 The Court shall ensure that the filing of the affidavits by the parties is not reduced to a mere ritual or formality. The Court shall scrutinize the affidavit threadbare and may decline to take the same on record unless it contains complete particulars mentioned Annexure A and is accompanied by the documents mentioned therein. 19.13 If the affidavit filed by the parties is not in the prescribed format or is not accompanied with the relevant documents, the learned Court shall not return it back to the filing counter as being done by same Courts. It would be appropriate for the Court to grant reasonable time to the parties to remove the defects/ deficiencies instead of returning back the affidavit to the filing counter. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 42 of 46 19.14 If a party has made concealment or false statement in his/her affidavit, the opposite party shall disclose the particulars of the same in his/her response on affidavit along with the material to show concealment or false statement. The aggrieved party may also seek permission of the Court to serve interrogatories and seek production of relevant documents from the opposite party under Order XI of the Code of Civil Procedure. 19.15 Whenever a party discloses sufficient material to show concealment or false statement in the affidavit of the opposite party, the Court may consider examining the deponent of the affidavit under Section 165 of the Evidence Act to elicit the truth. In appropriate cases, the Court may direct a party to file an additional affidavit relating to his assets, income and expenditure at the time of marriage and/or one year before separation and/or at the time of separation. 19.16 If the statements made in affidavit of assets, income and expenditure are found to be incorrect, the Court shall consider its effect while fixing the maintenance. However, action under Section 340 Cr.P.C. is ordinarily not warranted in matrimonial litigation till the decision of the main petition. 19.17 At the time of issuing notice, the Court shall consider directing the petitioner to deposit such sum, as the Court may consider appropriate, on the basis of petitioner’s affidavit, for payment to the respondent towards interim litigation/part litigation expenses. However, in cases such as divorce petition by the wife FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters who unable to support herself and is claiming maintenance from the respondent husband, it would not be appropriate to direct the petitioner-wife to pay the litigation expenses to the respondenthusband. 19.18 If the disposal of maintenance application is taking time, and the delay is causing hardship, ad-interim maintenance should be granted to the claimant spouse on the basis of admitted income of the respondent. 19.19 The application under Section 24 should be decided as expeditiously as possible otherwise the very object of the proviso to Section 24 would be defeated. 19.20 The aforesaid procedure be followed in all cases relating to maintenance including cases under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, Special Marriage Act, 1954 Indian Divorce Act, 1869 as well as Section 125 Cr.P.C. 19.21 It is clarified that the directions contained in the order dated 18th September, 2014 as well as this judgment are guidelines to determine the true income of the parties by applying the principles laid down in Sections 106 and 165 of the Indian Evidence Act read with Section 10(3) of the Family Courts Act, which cast a duty on the Court to determine the true income of the parties. These directions are necessitated because the parties in the matrimonial litigation do not disclose their true income and the claims of maintenance are dragged as long as upto two years and the Courts, FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters finding it difficult to determine the true income, tend to fix maintenance by drawing presumptions. 19.22 This Court would like to further clarify that while formulating the affidavit – Annexure A, many more questions and documents were considered, which would have complicated the affidavit and caused inconvenience to the litigants. In order to keep the affidavit concise and precise, this Court incorporated only important questions and documents. However, the Courts are at liberty to direct the parties to disclose further relevant facts and documents if deemed necessary to determine the true income. The Courts are also at liberty to consider Rules and formats of affidavits mentioned in para 18 to develop and further improve the format of the affidavit formulated by this Court. 20. The Courts below shall send their response to the working of these guidelines and further suggestions by 15th 21. All the parties in these appeals are directed to file fresh affidavits along with documents in terms of the format provided in Annexure ‘A’ hereto within six weeks. The response to the affidavits of the parties be filed within four weeks thereafter. July, 2015, which shall be considered by this Court thereafter. 22. List for directions on 9th 23. This Court appreciates the valuable assistance rendered by learned amici curiae Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Mr. Sunil Mittal and Ms. Anu Narula. This Court also appreciates the effective assistance rendered by Mr. Anuj Sabharwal and Mr. Arun April, 2015 at 2.30 P.M. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Wighmal, Law Researchers attached to this Court. 24. This Court is of the view that filing of affidavit of assets, income, expenditure and liabilities by both the parties in the prescribed format at the very threshold of matrimonial litigation as in developed countries would enable the Courts to pass maintenance order within 60 days in terms of Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and therefore should be incorporated in all the matrimonial statutes. Let this suggestion be considered by the Government. Copy of the order dated 18th 25. Copy of this judgment along with Annexure A be sent to Registrar General of this Court who shall send the same to all Family Courts and other Courts dealing with matrimonial cases. The format of the affidavit of assets, income and expenditure (Annexure A) be loaded in the website of the District Courts/Family Courts to enable the lawyers/litigants to download the same. September, 2014 and this judgment along with the Annexure A and compilation of the Rules/formats mentioned in Para 18 be sent to Mr. Sanjay Jain, learned ASG for taking up the matter with Ministry of Law and Justice. 26. Copy of the order dated 18th 27. Copy of this judgment along with the Annexure A be given September, 2014 as well as this judgment along with the Annexure A be also sent to the Delhi Judicial Academy to sensitize the judicial officers about the guidelines laid down by this Court. FAO 369/1996 & other connected matters Page 46 of 46 dasti to counsel for the parties as well as learned amici curiae under the signatures of the Court Master. J.R. MIDHA (JUDGE) JANUARY 14, 2015 dk/rsk 1 ANNEXURE A (FORMAT OF AFFIDAVIT OF ASSETS, INCOME AND EXPENDITURE TO BE FILED BY THE PARTIES IN ALL MAINTENANCE CASES) AFFIDAVIT I _______________________, son of / wife of ___________________, aged about ____ years, resident of ___________________________, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: PART - I Sl No. PERSONAL INFORMATION RELATING TO THE DEPONENT Description Particulars 1. Name 2. Age 3. Date of marriage 4. Date of separation 5. Educational qualifications 6. Professional qualifications 7. Occupation 8. Monthly income (Give details in Part IV) 9. Monthly expenditure ( Give details in Part V ) 10. Whether you are assessed to Income Tax? 11. Whether you are assessed to Wealth Tax? 12. Whether you have sufficient income to support yourself? 13. If not, whether you have claimed maintenance from your spouse? If so, how much? 14. Whether you are staying in matrimonial home? 15. If not staying in the matrimonial home, relationship and income of the person with whom staying. 16. Members of the family: (a) Dependent (b) Independent 2 17. Whether your spouse has claimed maintenance from you? If so, how much? 18. Whether you have voluntarily paid or willing to pay maintenance to your spouse? If so, how much? 19. Whether you are willing to pay litigation expenses to your spouse? If so, how much? 20. Particulars of pending litigation between the parties 21. Whether any maintenance order has been passed by any Court? If so, give particulars and attach copies of the order? 22. Whether the maintenance is being paid in terms of the aforesaid order? If so, file the statement of maintenance paid upto date 23. E-mail address 24. Name of your counsel and his/her e-mail address 25. Expenses incurred on this litigation 26. Particulars of the bank account with name and address of the bank for the purpose of payment from or receipt of maintenance, as the case may be PART - II 1. RELEVANT INFORMATION RELATING TO THE SPOUSE Educational and professional qualifications of your spouse 2. Whether your spouse is earning? If so, give particulars of the occupation and income of your spouse. 3. Whether your spouse is staying in the Matrimonial Home. If not, whether she is staying in his/her own accommodation or in a rented accommodation? If staying in a rented accommodation, what is the rent being paid by him/her? 4. Particulars of the assets and liabilities of your spouse 5. Do you have any documents relating to the income, assets and expenditure of your spouse? If so, give the particulars and attach copies thereof? 3 PART - III 1. RELEVANT INFORMATION RELATING TO THE CHILDREN Children from the marriage with their name and age 2. Who has the custody of the Children? 3. Expenditure on the education of the Children (Give details in Clause 7) 4. Who is bearing the expenditure of Children’s education 5. How much expenditure has been incurred on the children’s maintenance and children’s education from the date of separation till now? 6. If the children are in custody of your spouse, whether you have voluntarily paid or willing to pay the expenses for the children’s maintenance and education? If so, how much? 7. Details of expenditure on education Amount (in Rs.) (i) School fees (ii) Crech/Day Care/After school care (iii) Books/Stationery (iv) Private Tuitions (v) Sports (vi) Outings/summer camps/vacations (vii) Entertainment (viii) Others 4 PART-IV STATEMENT OF INCOME S.No Description Particulars 1. In case of salaried persons (i) Designation : (ii) Name and address of the employer (iii) Date of employment (iv) Gross Income including the salary, D.A., commissions/incentives, bonus, perks etc. (v) Perquisites and other benefits provided by the employer including accommodation, cars/other automotive, sweeper, gardener, watchman or personal attendant, gas, electricity, water, interest free or concessional loans, holiday expenses, free or concessional travel, free meals, free education, gifts, vouchers, etc. credit card expenses, club expenses, use of movable assets by employees, transfer of assets to employees, value of any other benefit/amenity/service/ privilege and the value of such perquisites and benefits (vi) Deductions from the gross income (vii) Income tax paid (viii) Net income (ix) Value of stock option benefits if provided by the employer (x) Pension and retirement benefits payable at the time of retirement 2. In case of self-employed persons: (i) Nature of business/profession (ii) Whether the business/profession is carried on as an individual, sole proprietorship concern, partnership concern, company or association of persons, HUF, joint family business or any other form. Give particulars of your share in the business/ profession. In case of partnership, specify the share in the profit/losses of the partnership 5 (iii) Number of employees (iv) Annual turnover/gross receipts (v) Gross Profit (vi) Income Tax (vii) Net Income (viii)Details and value of benefits in kind, perks or other remuneration received from the business e.g. provision of car, payment of accommodation etc (ix) Amount of regular monthly withdrawal or drawings from the business (x) Current value of your business interest(s) (xi) Current value of your business assets (xii) List of directorships held, sitting fees, commission or any other remuneration (xiii)Net worth of the company in which you are Director along with the number of shares held in the Company 3. Income from Other Sources (i) Agricultural Income : (ii) Rent (iii) Interest on bank deposits and FDRs (iv) Interest on investments including deposits, NSC, IVP, KVP, Post Office schemes, PPF, loans etc. (v) Dividends (vi) Income from machinery, plant or furniture let on hire. (vii) Gifts (viii) Profit on sale of movable/ immovable assets 4. Any other income not covered above TOTAL INCOME (Give monthly income) 6 PART V STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE S. No. Description Amount (in Rs.) 1. Housing Monthly rent Mortgage payment(s) Repairs & Maintenance Property tax 2. Household expenditure Groceries/Food/Personal care/clothing Water Electricity Gas Telephone TV Cable/Set-top Box charges & Internet services Maintenance, replacement and repair of household items, appliances and kitchenware items. Telephone Domestic full time/part time servant(s) Others (specify) 3. Transport (i) Car/Scooter (a) Driver(s) (b) Fuel (c) Repair/Maintenance (d) Insurance (e) Loan repayment 7 (ii) Public Transport (a) Bus (b) Taxi (c) Metro (d) Auto 4. Medical expenditure Doctor Medication Hospital Other medical expenditure Others (specify) 5. Insurance Life Annuity Householders 6. Entertainment and recreation Club Health Club Gym 7. Holiday and vacations 8. Gifts 9. Pocket money/allowance 10. Legal/litigation expenses 11. Discharge of Liabilities Credit card(s) payment Hire purchase/lease (i) Repayment of Loans (a) House loan (b) Car loan (c) Personal loan (d) Business loan 8 (e) Any other loan (ii) Name of the lenders (iii) Mode of repayment (iv) Instalment amount (v) Other personal liabilities 12. Miscellaneous Newspapers, magazines, books Religious contributions/ Charities Others (specify) 13. Other expenditure (not specified above) TOTAL EXPENDITURE (Give monthly expenditure) PART - VI STATEMENT OF ASSETS S. No. Assets Particulars Estimated Market Value 1. Real Estate Including land, built up properties, lease hold properties, agricultural land and investment in real estate such as booking of plots, flats and other immovable properties in your name or joint names. List any interest in properties, including lease hold interest and mortgages, whether or not you are registered as owner. Provide legal descriptions and indicate estimated market value of your interest without deducting encumbrances or costs of disposition.) (Record encumbrances under debts.) 2. Financial Assets: (i) Details of all bank accounts including Current and Savings Accounts in your name, or joint name and balance in the Account No. & Name of Bank Current Balance 9 said account (ii) Cash in hand 3. Investments Details of all investments you hold or, in which you have interest and their current value: (i) FDRs, NSC, IVP, KVP, Post Office schemes, PPF etc. (ii) Deposits with Government and NonGovernment entities (iii) Stocks, shares, debentures, bonds, units and mutual funds, etc. (iv) Life and endowment policies and surrender value (v) Loan given to friends, relatives and others (vi) Other investments not covered by above items Particulars Current Value 4. Pensions and Registered Retirement Savings Plan Indicate name of institution where accounts are held, name and address of pension plan and pension details. Particulars Maturity amount 5. Corporate/Business Interests List any interest you hold, directly or indirectly, in any corporation, unincorporated business, partnership, trust, joint venture and Association of Persons, Society etc. Particulars Current value 6. Movable Assets (i) Motor Vehicles (List cars, motorcycles, scooters etc. along with their brand and registration number) (ii) Livestock (iii) Mobile phone(s) (iv) Computer/Laptop (v) Other electronic gadgets including I-pad etc. (vi) TV, Fridge, Air Conditioner, etc. Particulars Current value 10 (vii) Other household appliances (viii) Quantity of gold, silver and diamond jewellery (ix) Quantity of Silver Utensils 7. Intangible properties including patents, trademark, copyright design and goodwill and their value 8. About disposal of properties Particulars of properties (movable as well as immovable) sold/agreed to be sold between the date of marriage or one year from separation whichever is later upto the date of filing this affidavit and the sale consideration received from the purchaser Particulars Sale consideration received 9. Others List anything else of value that you own, including precious metals, collections, works of art, jewellery or household items of high value. Include location of any safety deposit lockers Particulars Estimated current value PART - VII JOINT PROPERTIES OF THE PARTIES S. No. Description Particulars 1. Properties presented at or about the time of marriage, which belong jointly to both the husband and wife. Give the status of their possession 2. Other joint properties of the parties. Give the status of their possession 11 PART - VIII STATEMENT OF LIABILITIES S. No. Description Particulars of Debts Current Value 1. Secured debt(s) List all mortgages, loans, and any other debts secured against an asset 2. Unsecured Debt(s) List all bank loans, personal loans, credits, overdrafts, credit cards and any other debts 3. Other List any other debts, including obligations that are relevant to a claim PART - IX GENERAL INFORMATION RELATING TO THE STATUS, STANDARD OF LIVING AND LIFESTYLE S. No. Description Particulars 1. Residential address 2. Area of residential accommodation (in sq. feet) 3. Who is the owner of the residential accommodation? In case of rented accommodation, specify the monthly rent 4. Name of school(s) where the child or children are studying 5. Number of part-time/full time domestic servants and their wages 6. Average monthly withdrawal from bank(s) 7. Mode of travel in city/outside city 12 8. Membership of clubs/health clubs/gyms, societies and other associations. Specify the membership fee and subscription 9. Particulars of credit/debit cards, its limit and usage 10. Particulars of frequent flier cards 11. Frequency of foreign travel, business as well as personal 12. Category of hotels ordinarily used for stay, official as well as personal 13. Category of hospitals opted for medical treatment including type of rooms 14. Brand of vehicle, mobile and wrist watch 15. Expenditure ordinarily incurred on family functions including birthday of the children 16. Expenditure ordinarily incurred on festivals 17. Expenditure incurred on marriage of family members 18. Status of the party/family: - High - Upper Middle - Middle - Lower Middle - Low - Below poverty line 13 PART - X DOCUMENTS RELATING TO ASSETS, INCOME AND EXPENDITURE OF THE DEPONENT PART A DOCUMENTS RELATING TO PERSONAL INFORMATION S. No. Description 1. Aadhar Card 2. PAN Card 3. Passport PART B DOCUMENTS RELATING TO INCOME, ASSETS AND LIABILITIES S. No. Description Please Tick Attached Not Applicable To follow 4. Statement of Account of all bank accounts including current and savings accounts for last 3 years 5. Income Tax Return(s) along with Statement of Income and Annexures for last 3 years 6. Wealth Tax return(s) with statement of assets/liabilities for the last 3 years 7. In case of Salaried Persons (i) Appointment Letter (ii) Salary slip (iii) Forms 16, 16A & 12BA (iv) Cost to Company Certificate and CIBIL Certificate, wherever applicable 14 (v) Copies of TDS certificates 8. In case of self-employed persons (i) Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account (ii) Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account of the proprietorship firm, if the business is carried on in the name of a sole proprietorship concern (iii) Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account of the partnership firm, if the deponent is a partner in a firm along with the Schedule showing the distribution of partners’ remuneration and share of profits/losses of the partnership firm and the copy of the partnership deed (iv) Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account of the Company in which the deponent is a Director (v) Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account of the Association of Persons, HUF, Joint Family business or trust in which the deponent has share (vi) Copies of TDS certificates 9. In case of Income from other sources : (i) Lease Deed(s)/Rent Agreement(s) /Licence Agreement(s) in respect of the rental income (ii) Interest Certificate in respect of the interest income on deposits and investments (iii) Dividend Certificates in 15 respect of dividend income (iv) Sale Deed(s)/transfer documents in respect of the profit on sale of property/properties 10. Other relevant documents relating to Income/Assets 11. Other relevant documents relating to liabilities PART C DOCUMENTS RELATING TO EXPENDITURE 12. (i) Documents relating to the expenditure on education of children including tuition fees (ii) Rent and maintenance receipts (iii) Electricity, water, security and gas bills (iv) Documents relating to the salary paid to the employees including servant(s) (v) Documents relating to expenditure on conveyance (vi) Debit and Credit Card statements (vii) Frequent Flier’s Card statements (viii) Mobile and landline phone bills (ix) Internet and TV cable/ Set - Top Box bills (x) Documents relating to the repayment of the loans (xi) PPF, EPF and other superannuation fund receipts (xii) Receipts of premium of insurance policies (xiii) Receipts of payments in respect of mutual funds (xiv) Documents relating to 16 payment of interest on bank and other loans (xv) Documents relating to the payment of taxes, including Income Tax, Wealth Tax and Property Tax (xvi) Other relevant documents relating to Expenditure Declaration: 1. I declare that I have made full and accurate voluntary disclosure of my income, expenditure, assets and liabilities from all sources. I further declare that I have no assets, income, expenditure and liabilities other than set out in this affidavit. 2. I undertake to inform this Court immediately upon any material change in my employment, assets, income, expenses or any other information included in this affidavit. 3. I understand that any false statement in this affidavit may constitute an offence under Section 199 read with Sections 191 and 193 of the Indian Penal Code punishable with imprisonment upto seven years and fine, and Section 209 of Indian Penal Code punishable with imprisonment upto two years and fine. I have read and understood Sections 191, 193 199 and 209 of the Indian Penal Code. DEPONENT Verification: Verified at ____________on this ____ day of ___________ that the contents of the above affidavit relating to my assets, income and expenditure are true to my knowledge, no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom, whereas the contents of the above affidavit relating to the assets, income and expenditure of my spouse are based on information believed to be true. I further verify that the copies of the documents filed along with the affidavit are the copies of the originals. DEPONENT

498a FIR quashed and proceedings emanating there from also quashed


                IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                       CRL.M.C. 3300/2014

        SANDDEP @ SANDEEP KUMAR @
        SANDEEP ROHILLA & ORS                   ..... Petitioners
       Through: Mr. Charanjeet & Mr. Pavitra Veer Chikar, Advocates

                     versus

        POOJA & ORS                                        ..... Respondents
       Through:      Mr. Ranvir Singh, Adv. for R-1
                            Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for State with SI
                            Nitin, PS Nand Nagri

        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA

                     ORDER
                     30.07.2014

CRL.M.A. 11413/2014

Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off.

CRL.M.C. 3300/2014

1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 5/08 registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on 04.01.2008 at Police Station Nand Nagri, Delhi, and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. It is stated that the FIR came to be registered as a result of certain matrimonial disputes between the petitioner No. 1, Sandeep @ Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Rohilla and respondent No. 1/complainant, Pooja @ Varsha Rohilla, and that all disputes and differences have since been resolved between the parties. The terms and conditions upon which the differences have been resolved are stated to have been duly recorded by a joint statement on oath before the ADJ (HMA), Karkardooma Court on 08.12.2009 in HMA No. 470/2009. A certified copy of said joint statement has also been annexed as Annexure 'C' to this petition.

3. The complainant/respondent No. 1, Pooja, who is also present in Court, is identified by her counsel, as well as the investigating Officer, SI Nitin, Police Station Nand Nagri. She states that she has received all the amounts mentioned in the said statement, and that she also has custody of the minor child in terms of the said statement. She further states that she does not wish to pursue the aforesaid FIR any further, and that she has no objection to the same being quashed by this Court. She also approbates all the terms and conditions as set out in the aforesaid joint statement recorded on 08.12.2009.

4. Issue notice.

5. Counsel for the State also accepts notice. She submits that looking to the circumstances, and since the complainant is not interested in pursuing the prosecution any further, no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the same.

6. In view of the overall circumstances; and looking to the pronouncements of the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, which has referred to a number of matters for the proposition that even a non-compoundable offence can also be quashed on the ground of a settlement agreement between the offender and the victim, if the circumstances so warrant; and also Narinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr. 2014(2) Crimes 27 (SC) where the Supreme Court held as follows:-

"31. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we sum up and lay down the following principles by which the High Court would be guided in giving adequate treatment to the settlement between the parties and exercising its power under Section 482 of the Code while accepting the settlement and quashing the proceedings or refusing to accept the settlement with direction to continue with the criminal proceedings:
(I) Power conferred under Section 482 of the Code is to be distinguished from the power which lies in the Court to compound the offences under Section 320 of the Code. No doubt, under Section 482 of the Code, the High Court has inherent power to quash the criminal proceedings even in those cases which are not compoundable, where the parties have settled the matter between themselves. However, this power is to be exercised sparingly and with caution.
(II) When the parties have reached the settlement and on that basis petition for quashing the criminal proceedings is filed, the guiding factor in such cases would be to secure:
(i) ends of justice, or
(ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court.
While exercising the power the High Court is to form an opinion on either of the aforesaid two objectives.
(III) Such a power is not be exercised in those prosecutions which involve heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity, etc. Such offences are not private in nature and have a serious impact on society. Similarly, for offences alleged to have been committed under special statute like the Prevention of Corruption Act or the offences committed by Public Servants while working in that capacity are not to be quashed merely on the basis of compromise between the victim and the offender.
(IV) On the other, those criminal cases having overwhelmingly and pre-dominantly civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or arising out of matrimonial relationship or family disputes should be quashed when the parties have resolved their entire disputes among themselves.
(V) While exercising its powers, the High Court is to examine as to whether the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak and continuation of criminal cases would put the accused to great oppression and prejudice and extreme injustice would be caused to him by not quashing the criminal cases.
(VI) Offences under Section 307 Indian Penal Code would fall in the category of heinous and serious offences and therefore is to be generally treated as crime against the society and not against the individual alone. However, the High Court would not rest its decision merely because there is a mention of Section 307 Indian Penal Code in the FIR or the charge is framed under this provision. It would be open to the High Court to examine as to whether incorporation of Section 307Indian Penal Code is there for the sake of it or the prosecution has collected sufficient evidence, which if proved, would lead to proving the charge under Section 307 Indian Penal Code. For this purpose, it would be open to the High Court to go by the nature of injury sustained, whether such injury is inflicted on the vital/delegate parts of the body, nature of weapons used etc. Medical report in respect of injuries suffered by the victim can generally be the guiding factor. On the basis of this prima facie analysis, the High Court can examine as to whether there is a strong possibility of conviction or the chances of conviction are remote and bleak. In the former case it can refuse to accept the settlement and quash the criminal proceedings whereas in the later case it would be permissible for the High Court to accept the plea compounding the offence based on complete settlement between the parties. At this stage, the Court can also be swayed by the fact that the settlement between the parties is going to result in harmony between them which may improve their future relationship.
(VII) While deciding whether to exercise its power under Section 482 of the Code or not, timings of settlement play a crucial role. Those cases where the settlement is arrived at immediately after the alleged commission of offence and the matter is still under investigation, the High Court may be liberal in accepting the settlement to quash the criminal proceedings/investigation. It is because of the reason that at this stage the investigation is still on and even the charge sheet has not been filed. Likewise, those cases where the charge is framed but the evidence is yet to start or the evidence is still at infancy stage, the High Court can show benevolence in exercising its powers favourably, but after prima facie assessment of the circumstances/material mentioned above. On the other hand, where the prosecution evidence is almost complete or after the conclusion of the evidence the matter is at the stage of argument, normally the High Court should refrain from exercising its power under Section 482 of the Code, as in such cases the trial court would be in a position to decide the case finally on merits and to come a conclusion as to whether the offence under Section 307 Indian Penal Code is committed or not. Similarly, in those cases where the conviction is already recorded by the trial court and the matter is at the appellate stage before the High Court, mere compromise between the parties would not be a ground to accept the same resulting in acquittal of the offender who has already been convicted by the trial court. Here charge is proved under Section 307 Indian Penal Code and conviction is already recorded of a heinous crime and, therefore, there is no question of sparing a convict found guilty of such a crime."
I am of the opinion that the matter, which is arising purely out of matrimonial dispute and has been settled between the parties, and since there is little likelihood of the prosecution succeeding in the matter, deserves to be given a quietus.

7. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 5/08 registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on 04.01.2008 at Police Station Nand Nagri, Delhi, and proceedings emanating therefrom, are hereby quashed.

8. The petition stands disposed off.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA Judge JULY 30, 2014 rd

Filing false criminal cases - Divorce granted and HC affirms lower court decree

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                                FAO No. 262-M of 2006 (O&M)

                                                      Date of Decision: 26.2.2015

Dr.Anita Rani                                                                                     ….Appellant.

Versus

Dr.Suresh Kumar                                                                              … Respondent.

CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SNEH PRASHAR.


PRESENT: Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. A.K. Chopra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gursher Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 2.11.2006 passed by the Additional District Judge, Rohtak, whereby the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short “the Act”) for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce was allowed, the appellant-wife has approached this Court by way of instant appeal.

2. Put shortly, the facts relevant for adjudication of the present appeal as narrated therein may be noticed. The parties are Dental Surgeons and got married on 4.2.1999 at Bahadurgarh according to Hindu rites. After the marriage, the appellant used to provoke the respondent all the times and pressurized him to live separately from the matrimonial home. She left the house on 1.9.1999 and then on 30.10.1999 to her parental house. She was brought back. They were employed at PHC Bhainswal Kalan and Banwasa, situated on two sides of Gohana town. They used to go upto Gohana jointly and part company to go to their respective PHCs. However, the appellant had no talk with the respondent while going upto Gohana. The respondent had met with an accident in February, 2000 and was to take rest for 4-5 days as he was unable to walk but the appellant had left to her parental house. Further, in March and April, 2000, the mother of the respondent had to undergo an eye operation and was admitted in Jiwan Eye Nursing Home, Rohtak but the appellant did not attend him. Thereafter, the appellant left the matrimonial home on 15.6.2000 without the consent of the respondent and returned back on 30.7.2000. To maintain peace in the family, the respondent separated kitchen. Thereafter, the appellant asked the respondent to break all relations with his parents and other family members. On 1.9.2000, the appellant left the matrimonial home in the absence of the respondent. The respondent along with his father went to the parental house of the appellant and on his repeated requests, she returned back. The appellant filed a petition under Section 9 of the Act for restitution of conjugal rights. A compromise was arrived at between the parties on 2.12.2000 and the said petition was dismissed. She agreed to live peacefully with the respondent but outside the court told that she would come in the matrimonial house after 10-12 days. However, she did not turn up despite repeated requests and ultimately she told that she had no interest to live with the respondent. Thereafter, the respondent convened panchayats on 24.12.2000 and 28.1.2001 and went to her parental house and after persuading took her back to the matrimonial home. She also agreed in writing that the respondent and his family members never offended her and she gave affidavit. On 13.4.2001, when the respondent went to purchase the newspaper from the market and to get his hair cutting from the barbar and when he returned back, he found the room locked and she did not turn up and went to her parents house and said that she would go directly from Bahadurgarh to PHC Banwasa and the lock had to be broken. She picked up quarrel with the respondent whenever he expressed his sexual desires. On 3.7.2001 and 10.8.2001, the respondent waited for her on the bus stand of Gohana but she did not turn up. When the appellant did not bring the salary continuously for two months, he inquired about the same in November, 2001. She told that she had been giving major part of her salary to her parents who had brought her up. She also started levelling false allegations against the respondent terming him as womanizer and that he had physical relations with the lady staff of the hospital. She was having a grudge from the very beginning qua the meeting of the respondent with his family members. After the marriage on 4.7.2002, on the asking of his father, the respondent asked the appellant to help his father with cash of ` 20,000/- to make the balance payment of various shopkeepers who supplied articles in the marriage, she got furious and started hurling abuses to him and his family members. She also said that his father had been committing theft of railway goods throughout his service career and what was the necessity to take ` 20,000/- from them. The respondent tried to convince the appellant but she continued levelling such type of false allegations and she snatched her Mangal Sutra and broke the same and asked the respondent to sell it in the market and get ` 20,000/-. Then she left the matrimonial house along with her ornaments. Accordingly, the respondent filed a petition under Section 13 of the Act for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce. The said petition was resisted by the appellant by filing a written statement. Besides raising various preliminary objections, it was pleaded that she was harassed for want of dowry and a case was registered against the respondent and his family members under Sections 498-A/406 of the Indian Penal Code on 4.9.2003. On 13.9.2003, a compromise was arrived at between the parties and they lived separately at Rohtak. The other averments made in the petition were denied and a prayer for dismissal of the same was made. Replication was filed controverting the averments made in the written statement. From the pleadings of the parties, the trial court framed the following issues:-

1. Whether the marriage of the parties to the petition is liable to be dissolved on the grounds of cruelties pleaded in the petition and replication? OPP

2. Relief.

3. In support of his case, the respondent besides examining himself as PW1, examined his father Hukam Chand as PW2, Satender Kumar as PW3, his sister Santosh as PW4 and Vinod Kumar PW5. On the other hand, the appellant examined Vinod Sharma as RW1, Satender Kumar as RW2, Vinod Kumar as RW3, Vijay Kumar as RW4, her father Laxman Singh as RW5, Hari Ram as RW7 and herself appeared as RW6. Various documents were also tendered in evidence by both the parties.

4. The trial court on appreciation of evidence led by the parties, decided issue No.1 in favour of the respondent holding that the acts of the appellant in insisting upon the department to initiate action against the respondent and also to prosecute him for demand of dowry show that the marriage had irretrievably been broken and such acts of the appellant amount to cruelty and were sufficient to dissolve marriage between the parties. Accordingly, the trial court vide judgment and decree dated 2.11.2006 allowed the petition and dissolved the marriage between the parties by a decree of divorce. Hence, the present appeal.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that from the evidence on record, no ground of cruelty was made out. It was further submitted that the respondent made a false story to get a decree of divorce whereas the respondent and his family members treated the appellant with cruelty. She was turned out of the matrimonial home many a times. According to the learned counsel, the allegations levelled by the respondent were general in nature and the respondent could not be allowed to take benefit of his own wrong.

6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent besides supporting the judgment passed by the trial court submitted that the appellant got him suspended and was also pressing hard to the department to initiate criminal proceedings against the respondent. It was contended that in the criminal case bearing FIR No. 220 dated 4.9.2003, registered under Sections 498-A, 406 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station City Bahadurgarh got registered by the appellant, the respondent and his parents were acquitted by the trial court vide judgment dated 23.2.2013. The said judgment has been taken on record as Annexure A-1 by way of additional evidence by this Court vide order of even date passed in CM No. 4164-CII of 2015.

7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any merit in the contentions of learned counsel for the appellant.

8. The primary question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the acquittal of the husband and his family members of matrimonial offences under Sections 406, 498-A of the Indian Penal Code would be sufficient to hold that it has caused mental cruelty to the husband so as to entitle him to a decree of divorce under Section 13(1) (ia) of the Act.

9. Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act empowers the Court to dissolve the matrimonial ties between the parties by a decree of divorce on a petition by either spouse where the said spouse has been treated with cruelty after the solemnization of the marriage. Cruelty has not been defined in the Act but various pronouncements of the Apex Court and other High Courts have outlined the scope of the term ‘cruelty’. Cruelty is evident where one spouse treats the other and manifests such feelings towards him or her as to cause reasonable apprehension that it will be harmful or injurious to live with the other spouse. Cruelty may be physical or mental. Whether a spouse is inflicted with physical cruelty or not, it can be judged on the basis of direct evidence whereas mental cruelty is to be inferred on analyzing the factual matrix of each case and drawing conclusion thereon.

10. The Apex Court in Parveen Mehta v. Inderjit Mehta 2002 (3) RCR (Civil) 529 had very elaborately analyzed the expression ‘cruelty’ as a ground of divorce under the Act. The relevant portion thereof reads thus:-

"Under the statutory provision cruelty includes both physical and mental cruelty. The legal conception of cruelty and the kind of degree of cruelty necessary to amount to a matrimonial offence has not been defined under the Act. Probably, the Legislature has advisedly refrained from making any attempt at giving a comprehensive definition of the expression that may cover all cases, realising the danger in making such attempt. The accepted legal meaning in England as also in India of this expression, which is rather difficult to define, had been ‘conduct of such character as to have caused danger to life, limb or health (bodily or mental), or as to give rise to a reasonable apprehension of such danger.

XX XX XX

XX XX XX

21. Cruelty for the purpose of Section 13(1)(ia) is to be taken as a behavior by one spouse towards the other which causes reasonable apprehension in the mind of the latter that it is not safe for him or
her to continue the matrimonial relationship with the other.

Mental cruelty is a state of mind and feeling with one of the spouses due to the behaviour or behavioural pattern by the other. Unlike the case of physical cruelty the mental cruelty is difficult
to establish by direct evidence. It is necessarily a matter of inference to be drawn from the facts and circumstances of the case. A feeling of anguish, disappointment and frustration in one spouse
caused by the conduct of the other can only be appreciated on assessing the attending facts and circumstances in which the two rt Chandigarh partners of matrimonial life have been living. The
inference has to be drawn from the attending facts and circumstances taken cumulatively. In case of mental cruelty it will not be a correct approach to take an instance of misbehaviour in isolation and
then pose the question whether such behaviour is sufficient by itself to cause mental cruelty. The approach should be to take the cumulative effect of the facts and circumstances emerging from the
evidence on record and then draw a fair inference whether the petitioner in the divorce petition has been subjected to mental cruelty due to conduct of the other."

11. Further, setting out illustrative cases of mental cruelty, the Supreme Court in Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh, (2007) 4 SCC 511 had held as under:-

“No uniform standard can ever be laid down for guidance, yet we deem it appropriate to enumerate some instances of human behaviour which may be relevant in dealing with the cases of ‘mental cruelty’. The instances indicated in the succeeding paragraphs are only illustrative and not exhaustive.

(i) On consideration of complete matrimonial life of the parties, acute mental pain, agony and suffering as would not make possible for the parties to live with each other could come within the broad parameters of mental cruelty.

(ii) On comprehensive appraisal of the entire matrimonial life of the parties, it becomes abundantly clear that situation is such that the wronged party cannot reasonably be asked to put up with such conduct and continue to live with other party.

(iii) Mere coldness or lack of affection cannot amount to cruelty, frequent rudeness of language, petulance of manner, indifference and neglect may reach such a degree that it makes the married life for the other spouse absolutely intolerable.

(iv) Mental cruelty is a state of mind. The feeling of deep anguish, disappointment, frustration in one spouse caused by the conduct of other for a long time may lead to mental cruelty.

(v) A sustained course of abusive and humiliating treatment calculated to torture, discommode or render miserable life of the spouse.

(vi) Sustained unjustifiable conduct and behaviour of one spouse actually affecting physical and mental health of the other spouse. The treatment complained of and the resultant danger or apprehension must be very grave, substantial and weighty.

(vii) Sustained reprehensible conduct, studied neglect, indifference or total departure from the normal standard of conjugal kindness causing injury to mental health or deriving sadistic pleasure can also amount to mental cruelty.

(viii) The conduct must be much more than jealousy, selfishness, possessiveness, which causes unhappiness and dissatisfaction and emotional upset may not be a ground for grant of divorce on the ground of mental cruelty.

(ix) Mere trivial irritations, quarrels, normal wear and tear of the married life which happens in day to day life would not be adequate for grant of divorce on the ground of mental cruelty.

(x) The married life should be reviewed as a whole and a few isolated instances over a period of years will not amount to cruelty. The ill-conduct must be persistent for a fairly lengthy period, where the relationship has deteriorated to an extent that because of the acts and behaviour of a spouse, the wronged party finds it extremely difficult to live with the other party any longer, may amount to mental cruelty.

(xi) If a husband submits himself for an operation of sterilization without medical reasons and without the consent or knowledge of his wife and similarly if the wife undergoes vasectomy or abortion without medical reason or without the consent or knowledge of her husband, such an act of the spouse may lead to mental cruelty.

(xii) Unilateral decision of refusal to have intercourse for considerable period without there being any physical incapacity or valid reason may amount to mental cruelty.

(xiii) Unilateral decision of either husband or wife after marriage not to have child from the marriage may amount to cruelty.

(xiv) Where there has been a long period of continuous separation, it may fairly be concluded that the matrimonial bond is beyond repair. The marriage becomes a fiction though supported by a legal tie. By refusing to sever that tie, the law in such cases, does not serve the sanctity of marriage; on the contrary, it shows scant regard for the feelings and emotions of the parties. In such like situations, it may lead to mental cruelty.”

12. In addition to the aforesaid, certain other illustrations were added by the Apex Court in K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa (2013) 5 SCC 226 as under:-

“Making unfounded indecent defamatory allegations against the spouse or his or her relatives in the pleadings, filing of complaints or issuing notices or news items which may have adverse impact on the business prospect or the job of the spouse and filing repeated false complaints and cases in the court against the spouse would, in the facts of a case, amount to causing mental cruelty to the other spouse.”

13. Elucidating ‘mental cruelty’ the Apex Court in K. Srinivas Rao’s case (supra) concluded that if a false criminal complaint is filed against the spouse and his/her relatives regarding matrimonial offences, it would be a case of mental cruelty. Following the aforesaid pronouncement, the Division Bench of this Court in Imlesh v. Amit, AIR 2014 Punjab and Haryana 89, observed as under:-

“So far as the finding of the trial Court regarding cruelty on the basis of involvement in a false criminal case is concerned, it may be said that it in itself constitutes sufficient ground for granting
divorce as it amounted to cruelty. Reference in this regard may be made to the case in K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa (2013) 5 SCC 226: AIR 2013 SC 2176, where it was held by Hon’ble the Supreme Court that where indecent/ defamatory statements are made in the complaint/
criminal proceedings, the same singly and cumulatively amounted to mental cruelty warranting grant of divorce. If a false complaint is filed against the spouse or his/her relatives, it amounted to mental
cruelty. In the said case also, wife had filed a case under Section 498-A IPC and the husband and his family members were acquitted and decree of divorce was granted to the husband on that ground, as it amounted to mental cruelty.”

14. Similar view was reiterated by the Supreme Court in K. Srinivas v. K. Sunita Civil Appeal No. 1213 of 2006 decided on 19.11.2014 with the following observations:-

“4. In the case in hand, learned counsel for the Respondent-Wife has vehemently contended that it is not possible to label the wife’s criminal complaint detailed above as a false or a vindictive action. In other words, the acquittal of the Appellant and his family members in the criminal complaint does not by itself, automatically and justifiably, lead to the conclusion that the complaint was false; that only one complaint was preferred by the Respondent-Wife, whereas, in contradistinction, in K.Srinivas Rao a series of complaints by the wife had been preferred. The argument was premised on the averment that the investigation may have been faulty or the prosecution may have been so careless as to lead to the acquittal, but the acquittal would not always indicate that the Complainant had intentionally filed a false case. What should be kept in perspective, it is reasonably argued, that the Complainant is not the controlling conductor in this Orchestra, but only one of the musicians who must deliver her rendition as and when and how she is called upon to do. Secondly, according to the learned counsel, the position would have been appreciably different if a specific finding regarding the falsity of the criminal complaint was returned, or if the Complainant or a witness on her behalf had committed perjury or had recorded a contradictory or incredible testimony. Learned counsel for the Respondent-Wife states that neither possibility has manifested itself here and, therefore, it would be
unfair to the Respondent-Wife to conclude that she had exhibited such cruelty towards the Appellant and her in-laws that would justify the dissolution of her marriage.

5. The Respondent-Wife has admitted in her cross-examination that she did not mention all the incidents on which her Complaint is predicated, in her statement under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. It is not her case that she had actually narrated all these facts to the Investigating Officer, but that he had neglected to mention them. This, it seems to us, is clearly indicative of the fact that the
criminal complaint was a contrived afterthought. We affirm the view of the High Court that the criminal complaint was “ill advised”. Adding thereto is the factor that the High Court had been informed of the acquittal of the Appellant- Husband and members of his family. In these circumstances, the High Court ought to have concluded that the Respondent-Wife knowingly and intentionally filed a false complaint, calculated to embarrass and incarcerate the Appellant and seven
members of his family and that such conduct unquestionably constitutes cruelty as postulated in Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

6. Another argument which has been articulated on behalf of the learned counsel for the Respondent is that the filing of the criminal complaint has not been pleaded in the petition itself. As we see it, the criminal complaint was filed by the wife after filing of the husband’s divorce petition, and being subsequent events could have been looked into by the Court. In any event, both the parties were fully aware of this facet of cruelty which was allegedly suffered by the husband. When evidence was lead, as also when arguments were addressed, objection had not been raised on behalf of the Respondent-Wife that this aspect of cruelty was beyond the pleadings. We are, therefore, not impressed by this argument raised on her behalf.

7. In these circumstances, we find that the Appeal is well founded and deserves to be allowed. We unequivocally find that the Respondent- Wife had filed a false criminal complaint, and even one such
complaint is sufficient to constitute matrimonial cruelty.”

15. Examining the factual matrix in the present case, it may be noticed that the the parties were employed as Dental Surgeon in two separate Primary Health Centres and they were not having good relations. The respondent had signed on the register and had withdrawn her salary but she kept mum and thereafter started issuing letters to the department for taking action against him. The appellant also got registered a criminal case against the respondent and his family members. During investigation, some of the family members were found innocent and their names were kept in column No.2 of the report filed under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure but the appellant had moved an application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in which they were summoned. In the said case, the respondent was arrested and he had not informed his department for his absence and obtained casual leave for that period, the appellant got her suspended from the department by sending a letter. PW5 Vinod Kumar who is neighbourer of the respondent had stated that he along with the respondent brought the appellant from her parents house and she had levelled allegations against him that he used to take liquor with Dr.Suresh and once he tried to outrage her modesty who forcibly turned him out of the house. PW4 Santosh, sister of the respondent also stated that the appellant had ignored the family and also humiliated the family. The allegation of demand of dowry was not justified as the appellant was getting salary of ` 15,000/- per month and there was no question to harass her on account of demand of dowry. The respondent had withdrawn the salary of the appellant for the month of September, 2003 for which she kept mum and thereafter she had given an affidavit to the effect that she had no complaint or grudge against her husband or his family members nor they harassed her. Additionally, a criminal case was lodged against the husband and his family members vide FIR No. 220 dated 4.9.2003 under Sections 498-A, 406 of the Indian Penal Code wherein the respondent was arrested but the final outcome resulted in their acquittal by the trial court vide judgment dated 23.2.2013, Annexure A-1, taken on record as additional evidence vide order of even date passed in CM No. 4164-CII of 2015. In such circumstances, it would cause a reasonable apprehension in the mind of the husband that it was not safe for him to live with the wife. Besides, refusing to attend household chores and showing disrespect to the respondent and his family members amounted to cruelty towards the respondent. Thus, the irresistible conclusion would be that the appellant-wife had treated the husband-respondent with cruelty.

16. Learned counsel for the appellant was unable to demonstrate that there was any error or perversity in the findings recorded by the trial court which may warrant interference by this Court. Accordingly, finding no merit in the appeal, the same is hereby dismissed. No costs.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)

(SNEH PRASHAR)

JUDGE

February 26, 2015

GURBACHAN SINGH

2015.03.10

Thursday, July 3, 2014

No automatic arrests under DUBIOUS dowry law - Supreme Court

REPORTABLE

                                     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                   CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1277 OF 2014
                        (@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.9127 of 2013)

ARNESH KUMAR ..... APPELLANT

VERSUS

STATE OF BIHAR & ANR .... RESPONDENTS

J U D G M E N T
Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter called as IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The maximum sentence provided under Section 498-A IPC is imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and fine whereas the maximum sentence provided under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act is two years and with fine.

Petitioner happens to be the husband of respondent no.2 Sweta Kiran. The marriage between them was solemnized on 1st July, 2007. His attempt to secure anticipatory bail has failed and hence he has knocked the door of this Court by way of this Special Leave Petition.

Leave granted.

In sum and substance, allegation levelled by the wife against the appellant is that demand of Rupees eight lacs, a maruti car, an air-conditioner, television set etc. was made by her mother-in-law and father-in-law and when this fact was brought to the appellant̢۪s notice, he supported his mother and threatened to marry another woman. It has been alleged that she was driven out of the matrimonial home due to non- fulfilment of the demand of dowry.

Denying these allegations, the appellant preferred an application for anticipatory bail which was earlier rejected by the learned Sessions Judge and thereafter by the High Court.

There is phenomenal increase in matrimonial disputes in recent years. The institution of marriage is greatly revered in this country. Section 498-A of the IPC was introduced with avowed object to combat the menace of harassment to a woman at the hands of her husband and his relatives. The fact that Section 498-A is a cognizable and non-bailable offence has lent it a dubious place of pride amongst the provisions that are used as weapons rather than shield by disgruntled wives. The simplest way to harass is to get the husband and his relatives arrested under this provision. In a quite number of cases, bed-ridden grand-fathers and grand-mothers of the husbands, their sisters living abroad for decades are arrested. Crime in India 2012 Statistics published by National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs shows arrest of 1,97,762 persons all over India during the year 2012 for offence under Section 498-A of the IPC, 9.4% more than the year 2011. Nearly a quarter of those arrested under this provision in 2012 were women i.e. 47,951 which depicts that mothers and sisters of the husbands were liberally included in their arrest net. Its share is 6% out of the total persons arrested under the crimes committed under Indian Penal Code. It accounts for 4.5% of total crimes committed under different sections of penal code, more than any other crimes excepting theft and hurt. The rate of charge-sheeting in cases under Section 498A, IPC is as high as 93.6%, while the conviction rate is only 15%, which is lowest across all heads. As many as 3,72,706 cases are pending trial of which on current estimate, nearly 3,17,000 are likely to result in acquittal.

Arrest brings humiliation, curtails freedom and cast scars forever. Law makers know it so also the police. There is a battle between the law makers and the police and it seems that police has not learnt its lesson; the lesson implicit and embodied in the Cr.PC. It has not come out of its colonial image despite six decades of independence, it is largely considered as a tool of harassment, oppression and surely not considered a friend of public. The need for caution in exercising the drastic power of arrest has been emphasized time and again by Courts but has not yielded desired result. Power to arrest greatly contributes to its arrogance so also the failure of the Magistracy to check it. Not only this, the power of arrest is one of the lucrative sources of police corruption. The attitude to arrest first and then proceed with the rest is despicable. It has become a handy tool to the police officers who lack sensitivity or act with oblique motive.

Law Commissions, Police Commissions and this Court in a large number of judgments emphasized the need to maintain a balance between individual liberty and societal order while exercising the power of arrest. Police officers make arrest as they believe that they possess the power to do so. As the arrest curtails freedom, brings humiliation and casts scars forever, we feel differently. We believe that no arrest should be made only because the offence is non-bailable and cognizable and therefore, lawful for the police officers to do so. The existence of the power to arrest is one thing, the justification for the exercise of it is quite another. Apart from power to arrest, the police officers must be able to justify the reasons thereof. No arrest can be made in a routine manner on a mere allegation of commission of an offence made against a person. It would be prudent and wise for a police officer that no arrest is made without a reasonable satisfaction reached after some investigation as to the genuineness of the allegation. Despite this legal position, the Legislature did not find any improvement. Numbers of arrest have not decreased. Ultimately, the Parliament had to intervene and on the recommendation of the 177th Report of the Law Commission submitted in the year 2001, Section 41 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.PC), in the present form came to be enacted. It is interesting to note that such a recommendation was made by the Law Commission in its 152nd and 154th Report submitted as back in the year 1994. The value of the proportionality permeates the amendment relating to arrest. As the offence with which we are concerned in the present appeal, provides for a maximum punishment of imprisonment which may extend to seven years and fine, Section 41(1)(b), Cr.PC which is relevant for the purpose reads as follows:

â€Å“41. When police may arrest without warrant.-(1) Any police officer may without an order from a Magistrate and without a warrant, arrest any person –

(a)x x x x x x

(b)against whom a reasonable complaint has been made, or credible information has been received, or a reasonable suspicion exists that he has committed a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years whether with or without fine, if the following conditions are satisfied, namely :-

(i) x x x x x

(ii) the police officer is satisfied that such arrest is necessary to prevent such person from committing any further offence; or for proper investigation of the offence; or
to prevent such person from causing the evidence of the offence to disappear or tampering with such evidence in any manner; or
to prevent such person from making any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the police officer; or
as unless such person is arrested, his presence in the Court whenever required cannot be ensured, and the police officer shall record while making such arrest, his reasons in writing:

Provided that a police officer shall, in all cases where the arrest of a person is not required under the provisions of this sub-section, record the reasons in writing for not making the arrest.

X x x x x x

From a plain reading of the aforesaid provision, it is evident that a person accused of offence punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years with or without fine, cannot be arrested by the police officer only on its satisfaction that such person had committed the offence punishable as aforesaid. Police officer before arrest, in such cases has to be further satisfied that such arrest is necessary to prevent such person from committing any further offence; or for proper investigation of the case; or to prevent the accused from causing the evidence of the offence to disappear; or tampering with such evidence in any manner; or to prevent such person from making any inducement, threat or promise to a witness so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or the police officer; or unless such accused person is arrested, his presence in the court whenever required cannot be ensured. These are the conclusions, which one may reach based on facts. Law mandates the police officer to state the facts and record the reasons in writing which led him to come to a conclusion covered by any of the provisions aforesaid, while making such arrest. Law further requires the police officers to record the reasons in writing for not making the arrest. In pith and core, the police office before arrest must put a question to himself, why arrest? Is it really required? What purpose it will serve? What object it will achieve? It is only after these questions are addressed and one or the other conditions as enumerated above is satisfied, the power of arrest needs to be exercised. In fine, before arrest first the police officers should have reason to believe on the basis of information and material that the accused has committed the offence. Apart from this, the police officer has to be satisfied further that the arrest is necessary for one or the more purposes envisaged by sub-clauses (a) to (e) of clause (1) of Section 41 of Cr.PC.

An accused arrested without warrant by the police has the constitutional right under Article 22(2) of the Constitution of India and Section 57, Cr.PC to be produced before the Magistrate without unnecessary delay and in no circumstances beyond 24 hours excluding the time necessary for the journey. During the course of investigation of a case, an accused can be kept in detention beyond a period of 24 hours only when it is authorised by the Magistrate in exercise of power under Section 167 Cr.PC. The power to authorise detention is a very solemn function. It affects the liberty and freedom of citizens and needs to be exercised with great care and caution. Our experience tells us that it is not exercised with the seriousness it deserves. In many of the cases, detention is authorised in a routine, casual and cavalier manner. Before a Magistrate authorises detention under Section 167, Cr.PC, he has to be first satisfied that the arrest made is legal and in accordance with law and all the constitutional rights of the person arrested is satisfied. If the arrest effected by the police officer does not satisfy the requirements of Section 41 of the Code, Magistrate is duty bound not to authorise his further detention and release the accused. In other words, when an accused is produced before the Magistrate, the police officer effecting the arrest is required to furnish to the Magistrate, the facts, reasons and its conclusions for arrest and the Magistrate in turn is to be satisfied that condition precedent for arrest under Section 41 Cr.PC has been satisfied and it is only thereafter that he will authorise the detention of an accused. The Magistrate before authorising detention will record its own satisfaction, may be in brief but the said satisfaction must reflect from its order. It shall never be based upon the ipse dixit of the police officer, for example, in case the police officer considers the arrest necessary to prevent such person from committing any further offence or for proper investigation of the case or for preventing an accused from tampering with evidence or making inducement etc., the police officer shall furnish to the Magistrate the facts, the reasons and materials on the basis of which the police officer had reached its conclusion. Those shall be perused by the Magistrate while authorising the detention and only after recording its satisfaction in writing that the Magistrate will authorise the detention of the accused. In fine, when a suspect is arrested and produced before a Magistrate for authorising detention, the Magistrate has to address the question whether specific reasons have been recorded for arrest and if so, prima facie those reasons are relevant and secondly a reasonable conclusion could at all be reached by the police officer that one or the other conditions stated above are attracted. To this limited extent the Magistrate will make judicial scrutiny.

Another provision i.e. Section 41A Cr.PC aimed to avoid unnecessary arrest or threat of arrest looming large on accused requires to be vitalised. Section 41A as inserted by Section 6 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008(Act 5 of 2009), which is relevant in the context reads as follows:


â€Å“41A. Notice of appearance before police officer.-(1) The police officer shall, in all cases where the arrest of a person is not required under the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 41, issue a notice directing the person against whom a reasonable complaint has been made, or credible information has been received, or a reasonable suspicion exists that he has committed a cognizable offence, to appear before him or at such other place as may be specified in the notice.

(2) Where such a notice is issued to any person, it shall be the duty of that person to comply with the terms of the notice.

(3) Where such person complies and continues to comply with the notice, he shall not be arrested in respect of the offence referred to in the notice unless, for reasons to be recorded, the police officer is of the opinion that he ought to be arrested.

(4) Where such person, at any time, fails to comply with the terms of the notice or is unwilling to identify himself, the police officer may, subject to such orders as may have been passed by a competent Court in this behalf, arrest him for the offence mentioned in the notice.

Aforesaid provision makes it clear that in all cases where the arrest of a person is not required under Section 41(1), Cr.PC, the police officer is required to issue notice directing the accused to appear before him at a specified place and time. Law obliges such an accused to appear before the police officer and it further mandates that if such an accused complies with the terms of notice he shall not be arrested, unless for reasons to be recorded, the police office is of the opinion that the arrest is necessary. At this stage also, the condition precedent for arrest as envisaged under Section 41 Cr.PC has to be complied and shall be subject to the same scrutiny by the Magistrate as aforesaid.

We are of the opinion that if the provisions of Section 41, Cr.PC which authorises the police officer to arrest an accused without an order from a Magistrate and without a warrant are scrupulously enforced, the wrong committed by the police officers intentionally or unwittingly would be reversed and the number of cases which come to the Court for grant of anticipatory bail will substantially reduce. We would like to emphasise that the practice of mechanically reproducing in the case diary all or most of the reasons contained in Section 41 Cr.PC for effecting arrest be discouraged and discontinued.

Our endeavour in this judgment is to ensure that police officers do not arrest accused unnecessarily and Magistrate do not authorise detention casually and mechanically. In order to ensure what we have observed above, we give the following direction:

All the State Governments to instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A of the IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves about the necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from Section 41, Cr.PC;

All police officers be provided with a check list containing specified sub- clauses under Section 41(1)(b)(ii);

The police officer shall forward the check list duly filed and furnish the reasons and materials which necessitated the arrest, while forwarding/producing the accused before the Magistrate for further detention;

The Magistrate while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report furnished by the police officer in terms aforesaid and only after recording its satisfaction, the Magistrate will authorise detention;

The decision not to arrest an accused, be forwarded to the Magistrate within two weeks from the date of the institution of the case with a copy to the Magistrate which may be extended by the Superintendent of police of the district for the reasons to be recorded in writing;

Notice of appearance in terms of Section 41A of Cr.PC be served on the accused within two weeks from the date of institution of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the District for the reasons to be recorded in writing;

Failure to comply with the directions aforesaid shall apart from rendering the police officers concerned liable for departmental action, they shall also be liable to be punished for contempt of court to be instituted before High Court having territorial jurisdiction.

Authorising detention without recording reasons as aforesaid by the judicial Magistrate concerned shall be liable for departmental action by the appropriate High Court.

We hasten to add that the directions aforesaid shall not only apply to the cases under Section 498-A of the I.P.C. or Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the case in hand, but also such cases where offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years; whether with or without fine.

We direct that a copy of this judgment be forwarded to the Chief Secretaries as also the Director Generals of Police of all the State Governments and the Union Territories and the Registrar General of all the High Courts for onward transmission and ensuring its compliance.

By order dated 31st of October, 2013, this Court had granted provisional bail to the appellant on certain conditions. We make this order absolute.

In the result, we allow this appeal, making our aforesaid order dated 31st October, 2013 absolute; with the directions aforesaid.


(CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD)

........................................................................J

(PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE)

........................................................................J

NEW DELHI, July 2, 2014.










Police need to follow SC (Supreme Court) guidelines for casual arrests  under section 498A and section 4 of DP Act, but also to any other penal provision for imprisonment up to seven years.

Supreme Court (SC) formulates punishment for police and magistrates for casual arrests under section 498A and section 4 of DP Act, but also to any other penal provision for imprisonment up to seven years.


Friday, May 16, 2014

All about being a LAWYER

                                                         All about being a Lawyer
“A lawyer with his briefcase can make more money than a burglar with a gun,
if he has a sharp wit and intelligence.” – Marion Puzo in The Godfather.

The first thing that will strike you about lawyers – you speak to them and you will see that
they are cautious. Law is the set of rules which governs the behaviour of person, companies,
the government at the center and states and any other entity. The offending party can be
punished under the rule of law. Unlike modern careers such as those related to management,
computers, bio-technology, call centers, law in India has a glorious history. Decades ago,
it was meant for those from a well-to-do family. Almost all the leadership of pre-Independence
India comprised lawyers. Gandhi, Nehru, Jinnah were all lawyers. Lawyers had a significant
impact on the destiny of this nation. The present is not as glorious as past but it is not bleak either.
The social acceptability is there so is the wealth, honour and recognition provided you excel in
your work. The degree of competition that prevails in the profession is very high. A large numbers
of law graduates pass every year. They are allowed to enroll and practice in any court in any part
of the country.

Legal Profession – All about being a Lawyer 

Personal Characteristics
 “…Abstract figures clad in black and white …

The swirl and swish of gowns…
A smooth yet brisk stride and aura of controlled power…

A silent but tangible pleasure at their faces…
The awe on the faces of spectators, visitors and other mere mortals…
{Extract from the Introduction to Careers in law by Geetanjli Pandit}

Four stage of a lawyers life as
Stage – I No work no money
Stage – II Work but no money
Stage – III Work and money
Stage – IV No work yet money
The picture that emerges is clear.

Initially you will have to scratch around to get work. After a few years you may be getting work regularly but you will not be making too much money. It may take upto a decade before you are able to get work and make money. And if your are really good and work hard then after a couple of decades you may reach stage IV where you may make money without really working for long hours. In other words you get paid merely for offering your opinion drawing upon years of experience. However very few lawyers reach Stage IV.

“Once you cross the initial hurdles, then sky is the limit.” Hardwork, dedication and regard for you client are the important qualities needed. You must have a good reading habit, maintain a library and keep yourself up-to-day happenings.

As a lawyer you have to assimilate and analyse the fact quickly. You have to distinguish relevant from the irrelevant, separate the grain from the chaff and apply the law in the situation under scrutiny.

Fluency in written and spoken language and excellent presentation skills are essential to present your case in the court. Your interrogation and cross-examination must be to the point (i.e. precise) and concise. Your should avoid verbosity.

Entry Into the Profession
It is quite easy to get into an LL.B. Course, though some universities conduct entrance exams and interviews. For some good universities competition is as high as competition for entrances for MBA’s or MCA’S. But there are universities which check the basic general knowledge of students and their entrance exams are not very tough. The LL.B. Course is designed to give you the knowledge of law but not the skills needed for the legal profession.

 “A bachelor’s course in law won’t teach you the lawyering skills”. It equips you with the weapon – The Law. But it does not teach you how to use it. It is on you how you use your weapon and make it more lethal.

And remember you may be the topper from a law college, but that is not enough to make you a good lawyer. Neither your senior your client is going to ask you about your academic performance in LL.B. It is your expertise and experience in handling your client and their cases that bear out your potential.

Nature of the job
Victory in the Court is sweet. But behind it lies a lot of hard work. Winning the case for the client is the duty and responsibility of a lawyer. The arguments and the cross-examinations that follow in the Court are basically the fruits of sleepless nights in your library on the lookout for the correct reference that you may need to present in your client’s case in the court. For that your must be thorough with the nuances of the law.

Essential Qualities Required
One must have very good knowledge of what one is practicing. One must have the capacity to patiently convince the judge of the point of law which one is propagating.

Law As a Profession – How Good?
Law makes a very good wife but a poor mistress. You have to be married to it. You can’t play with it. If you work hard and if you have the capabilities, you will be at the top. And at the top, law is the most rewarding profession. And there is no death of money provided you establish yourself in the profession.

Bar Council has disciplinary jurisdiction
Legal profession in India is governed by ‘The Advocates Act, 1961’. It is a self-contained Code of Law relating to legal profession and this Act extends to the whole of India. This is an Act to amend and consolidate the law relating to legal practitioners and to provide for the constitution of Bar Councils andBar Council of India. Persons enrolled as advocates with any Bar Council are entitled to practice the Profession of Law throughout the country. No person can be enrolled with more than one Bar Council. The Bar Councils have disciplinary jurisdiction over advocates on their rolls, but his is subject to appeal to the Bar Council of India and a further right of appeal o the Supreme Court of India.